Pinpoint · Judgment search

Eastern Express Pty Ltd v General Newspapers Pty Ltd

(1992) 35 FCR 43

1992 · Find the judgment

Cited by 48 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 15 Cited 33

1996: 2 citing judgments 1998: 2 citing judgments 1999: 3 citing judgments 2000: 1 citing judgment 2001: 6 citing judgments 2002: 2 citing judgments 2003: 5 citing judgments 2004: 2 citing judgments 2005: 1 citing judgment 2006: 2 citing judgments 2007: 2 citing judgments 2008: 1 citing judgment 2009: 1 citing judgment 2010: 2 citing judgments 2011: 1 citing judgment 2012: 1 citing judgment 2014: 3 citing judgments 2015: 3 citing judgments 2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 2 citing judgments 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 2 citing judgments 2024: 1 citing judgment 1992 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. News Ltd v Australian Rugby Football League Ltd [1996] FCA 72 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. Commonwealth of Australia v Oceantalk Pty Ltd (t/as Navionics Australia) [1998] FCA 34 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Robert Hicks Pty Ltd (t/as Auto Fashions Australia) v Melway Publishing Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 1379 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  4. Charlick Trading Pty Ltd v Australian National Railways Commission [1999] FCA 452 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  5. Melway Publishing Pty Ltd v Robert Hicks Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 664 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  6. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Boral Ltd [1999] FCA 1318 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  7. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Rural Press Limited [2001] FCA 116 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  8. NT Power Generation Pty Ltd v Power & Water Authority [2001] FCA 334 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 11× · judgment
  9. ACCC v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Limited (No 2) [2001] FCA 1861 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 19× · judgment
  10. Monroe Topple & Associates Pty Ltd v Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia [2002] FCAFC 197 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 43× · judgment
  11. Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [2003] FCAFC 193 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 72× · judgment
  12. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Liquorland (Australia) Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 826 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 9× · judgment
  13. Mt Romance Australia Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission [2010] FCA 761 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  14. Mushroom Composters Pty Ltd v IS & DE Robertson Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 1 Applied or followed NSW Court of Appeal · cited 27× · judgment
  15. Loureiro v Mac Aus Unit Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 226 Applied or followed Supreme Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.