Pinpoint · Judgment search

Paul Mitchell Systems (Australia) Pty Ltd v Paul Mitchell Systems PTE Ltd & Ors

[1995] FCA 573

Federal Court of Australia · 21 July 1995 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (22)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. (1695) 90 ER 231 Cited
  2. SS Hontestroom v SS Sagaporack [1927] AC 37 Cited cited 72×
  3. Paterson v Paterson [1953] HCA 74 Cited cited 46×
  4. Ratten v The Queen [1971] UKPC 23 Cited cited 15×
  5. BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Hastings Shire Council [1977] HCA 40 Cited cited 123×
  6. BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings [1977] UKPCHCA 1 Cited cited 33×
  7. (1979) 28 ALR 202 Cited
  8. Warren v Coombes [1979] HCA 9 Cited cited 595×
  9. Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales [1982] HCA 24 Cited cited 1,322×
  10. Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation [1984] HCA 64 Cited cited 606×
  11. (1986) 62 ALR 53 Cited
  12. Norbis v Norbis [1986] HCA 17 Cited cited 255×
  13. Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×
  14. Lombok Pty Ltd v Supetina Pty Ltd (1987) 14 FCR 226 Cited cited 9×
  15. R v Andrews [1987] 1 AC 281 Cited cited 2×
  16. Abalos v Australian Postal Commission (1988) 171 CLR 167 Cited cited 28×
  17. Jones v Hyde [1989] HCA 20 Cited cited 81×
  18. Walton v The Queen [1989] HCA 9 Cited cited 26×
  19. Hawkins v Pender Bros Pty Ltd [1990] 1 Qd R 135 Cited cited 13×
  20. Poseidon Ltd v Adelaide Petroleum NL [1991] FCA 663 Cited cited 35×
  21. Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1992) 177 CLR 472 Cited cited 13×
  22. Cummings v Lewis [1993] FCA 190 Cited cited 122×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.