Pinpoint · Judgment search

MATKEVICH v NEW SOUTH WALES TECHNICAL AND FURTHER EDUCATION COMMISSION [No 2]

[1995] NSWCA 279

NSW Court of Appeal · 17 November 1995 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (12)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Ex parte Corbishley; Re Locke [1967] 2 NSWR 547 Cited cited 4×
  2. Director-General of Social Services v Chaney [1980] FCA 87 Cited cited 129×
  3. Metropolitan Water Sewerage and Drainage Board v Histon (1982) 2 NSWLR 720 Cited cited 13×
  4. (1982) 2 NSWLR 721 Cited
  5. Clisdell v Commissioner of Police (1982) 31 NSWLR 555 Distinguished
  6. Ultra Tune (Aust) Pty Ltd and Anor v Swann and Ors (1984) 8 IR 122 Cited cited 2×
  7. [1986] NSWJB 244 Cited
  8. Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd (in liq) v Darling Harbour Authority (1991) 24 NSWLR 156 Cited cited 146×
  9. Smith v Allan (1993) 31 NSWLR 52 Cited cited 13×
  10. Clisdell v Commissioner of Police (1993) 31 NSWLR 555 Applied or followed cited 19×
  11. Matkevich v New South Wales Technical & Further Education Commission (1995) 36 NSWLR 718 Cited cited 4×
  12. [1995] NSWJB 136 Distinguished
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.