Federal Court of Australia · 6 March 1998 · Official judgment
No indexed judgment cites this case yet.
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[1904] 2 KB 161 Cited cited 7×[1904] 1 KB 94 Cited cited 6×[1908] 2 KB 474 Cited cited 19×[1951] Ch 313 Cited cited 7×[1955] HCA 75 Cited cited 59×[1988] HCA 34 Cited cited 135×[1992] FCA 863 Cited cited 1×Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
[1904] 1 KB 94
Cited cited 6× [1904] 2 KB 161
Cited cited 7× [1908] 2 KB 474
Cited cited 19× [1951] Ch 313
Cited cited 7× [1955] HCA 75
Cited cited 59× [1988] HCA 34
Cited cited 135× [1992] FCA 863
Cited Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.