PinpointMitchell Cosh v R
District Court of NSW · 28 March 2019 · Official judgment
Cited by 0 indexed judgments
No indexed judgment cites this case yet.
Tree of authority
Built on
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
R v Katarzynski
[2002] NSWSC 613Applied or followed cited 44×- R v Muratovic
[1967] Qd R 15Cited cited 3× (1979) 1 A Crim R 464Cited cited 1×- Zecevic v Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic)
[1987] HCA 26Cited cited 75× - R v Dziduch
(1990) 47 A Crim R 378Cited cited 8× - R v Conlon
(1993) 69 A Crim R 92Cited cited 17× - R v Hawes
(1994) 35 NSWLR 294Cited cited 12×
- R v Muratovic
CHARARA v THE QUEEN
[2006] NSWCCA 244Cited cited 152×- Sweeney v Fitzhardinge
[1906] HCA 73Cited cited 30× - Paterson v Paterson
[1953] HCA 74Cited cited 46× - Da Costa v Cockburn Salvage & Trading Pty Ltd
[1970] HCA 43Applied or followed cited 47× - R v Apostilides
[1984] HCA 38Applied or followed cited 114× Fox v Percy
[2003] HCA 22Applied or followed cited 1,476×- Warren v Coombes
[1979] HCA 9Cited cited 595× - Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd
(1987) 10 NSWLR 247Cited cited 804× - Devries v Australian National Railways Commission
[1993] HCA 78Cited cited 520× - State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq)
[1999] HCA 3Cited cited 463×
- Warren v Coombes
GIANOUTSOS v GLYKIS
[2006] NSWCCA 137Applied or followed cited 120×- Briginshaw v Briginshaw
[1938] HCA 34Cited cited 3,164× - Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd
(1987) 10 NSWLR 247Cited cited 804× - Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd
[1992] HCA 66Cited cited 703× - Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority
(1993) 32 NSWLR 683Cited cited 595×
- Briginshaw v Briginshaw
- Sweeney v Fitzhardinge
Authorities cited (2)
Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
-
R v Katarzynski
[2002] NSWSC 613Applied or followed cited 44× -
CHARARA v THE QUEEN
[2006] NSWCCA 244Cited cited 152×
How the citator works
Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.