Home

Pinpoint · Most cited cases

Most cited

Cases ranked by how many judgments in Pinpoint’s index cite them, with how many of those distinguished, doubted, did not follow or overruled them.

Australian Capital Territory · ranks 651–685

  1. 651 [2020] ACTSC 65 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  2. 652 R v UD [2020] ACTSC 88 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  3. 653 R v Ngata [2020] ACTSC 9 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  4. 654 Reardon v Seselja [2021] ACTCA 4 ACT Court of Appeal 1 citing
  5. 655 Haider v Gudelj [2021] ACTCA 9 ACT Court of Appeal 1 citing
  6. 656 Scentre Management Ltd v ACT Planning and Land Authority [2021] ACTSC 171 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  7. 657 Marsh v Mushkin (No 3) [2021] ACTSC 182 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  8. 658 Pesec v Consolidated Builders Ltd (No 4) [2021] ACTSC 188 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  9. 659 Steadfast ICT Security Pty Ltd v Peak (No 2) [2021] ACTSC 319 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  10. 660 Aspen Medical Pty Ltd v BA Capital Inc [2021] ACTSC 321 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  11. 661 Volanne Pty Ltd v Donohue [2021] ACTSC 48 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  12. 662 Bloc (ACT) Pty Ltd v Crafted Capitol Pty Ltd [2021] ACTSC 81 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  13. 663 Zeltner v Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court [2022] ACTCA 34 ACT Court of Appeal 1 citing
  14. 664 Gindy v Capital Lawyers Pty Ltd [2022] ACTCA 66 ACT Court of Appeal 1 citing
  15. 665 Mertell v R [2022] ACTCA 69 ACT Court of Appeal 1 citing
  16. 666 R v Haque [2022] ACTSC 10 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  17. 667 ND v AB (No 3) [2022] ACTSC 197 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  18. 668 Nova Builders Pty Ltd v Civil & Civic Corporation Pty Ltd [2022] ACTSC 209 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  19. 669 Pesec v Zivko (No 2) [2022] ACTSC 270 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  20. 670 Ezekiel-Hart v Council of the Law Society of the ACT (No 3) [2022] ACTSC 300 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  21. 671 R v Mertell [2022] ACTSC 37 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  22. 672 Eastlund (a pseudonym) v Westlake (a pseudonym) [2022] ACTSC 52 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  23. 673 R v Carpenter [2022] ACTSC 6 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  24. 674 Eastlund (a pseudonym) v Orezykowski; Eastlund (a pseudonym) v Shavaiz [2022] ACTSC 68 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  25. 675 R v Lehrmann (No 2) [2022] ACTSC 92 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  26. 676 Commissioner for Fair Trading v Bowes Street Developments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] ACTSC 168 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  27. 677 Hoy v Hurst-Meyers (No 4) [2023] ACTSC 17 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  28. 678 Beno Excavations Pty Ltd v Harlech Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 6) [2023] ACTSC 245 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  29. 679 Fihelly v Bluen [2023] ACTSC 393 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  30. 680 Beno Excavations Pty Ltd v Harlech Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 8) [2023] ACTSC 399 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  31. 681 Hoy v Hurst-Meyers (No 3) [2023] ACTSC 6 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  32. 682 Porter v The Queen [2024] ACTCA 9 ACT Court of Appeal 1 citing
  33. 683 R v McBride (No 4) [2024] ACTSC 147 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  34. 684 Drumgold v Board of Inquiry (No. 3) [2024] ACTSC 58 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing
  35. 685 Walsh (a pseudonym) v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Canberra and Goulburn [2024] ACTSC 81 Supreme Court of the ACT 1 citing

Counts are judgments in this index citing the case, by neutral or report citation; one judgment counts once however often it cites the case. Treatment is read from the words of the citing sentence and is a guide only: open a case to see each citing judgment.