Home

Pinpoint · Most cited cases

Most cited

Cases ranked by how many judgments in Pinpoint’s index cite them, with how many of those distinguished, doubted, did not follow or overruled them.

United Kingdom · ranks 1–50

  1. 1 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1947] EWCA Civ 1 715 citing 5 negative
  2. 2 Hunter v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [1981] UKHL 13 195 citing 3 negative
  3. 3 Boardman v Phipps [1966] UKHL 2 173 citing
  4. 4 Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass [1971] UKHL 1 173 citing 2 negative
  5. 5 Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome [1972] UKHL 3 172 citing 2 negative
  6. 6 Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2000] UKHL 65 169 citing 4 negative
  7. 7 Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society [1997] UKHL 28 163 citing
  8. 8 Scott v Scott [1913] UKHL 2 135 citing
  9. 9 Donoghue v Stevenson [1931] UKHL 3 134 citing 1 negative
  10. 10 Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd [1968] UKHL 4 125 citing 1 negative
  11. 11 Wentworth Securities Ltd v Jones [1982] UKHL 5 121 citing
  12. 12 Calvin v Carr [1979] UKPC 1 118 citing 3 negative
  13. 13 L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd [1973] UKHL 2 117 citing
  14. 14 Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England (No 3) [2001] UKHL 16 117 citing
  15. 15 Stapley v Gypsum Mines Ltd [1953] UKHL 4 110 citing
  16. 16 American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] UKHL 1 110 citing 2 negative
  17. 17 Mahon v Air New Zealand Ltd [1983] UKPC 29 104 citing 2 negative
  18. 18 Pegang Mining Co Ltd v Choong Sam [1969] UKPC 16 101 citing 1 negative
  19. 19 Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1896] UKHL 1 99 citing 1 negative
  20. 20 Gissing v Gissing [1970] UKHL 3 94 citing 1 negative
  21. 21 Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] UKHL 38 94 citing 1 negative
  22. 22 R v Kelly (Edward) [1999] UKHL 4 91 citing
  23. 23 Derry v Peek [1889] UKHL 1 88 citing 1 negative
  24. 24 Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd [1997] UKHL 19 88 citing 2 negative
  25. 25 Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan [1995] UKPC 4 87 citing 4 negative
  26. 26 Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd [1914] UKHL 1 86 citing
  27. 27 X (Minors) v Bedfordshire County Council [1995] UKHL 9 85 citing 1 negative
  28. 28 Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd [2004] UKHL 46 81 citing
  29. 29 Environment Agency v Empress Car Co (Abertillery) Ltd [1998] UKHL 5 80 citing
  30. 30 Australian Mutual Provident Society v Chaplin [1978] UKPC 7 79 citing
  31. 31 Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns [1995] UKHL 10 77 citing
  32. 32 Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd [1988] UKHL 12 76 citing 1 negative
  33. 33 Liversidge v Anderson [1941] UKHL 1 75 citing
  34. 34 Liverpool City Council v Irwin [1976] UKHL 1 75 citing
  35. 35 Meridian Global Funds Management Asia Ltd v Securities Commission [1995] UKPC 5 75 citing 1 negative
  36. 36 Hillas & Co Ltd v Arcos Ltd [1932] UKHL 2 74 citing 2 negative
  37. 37 Bonnington Castings Ltd v Wardlaw [1956] UKHL 1 74 citing 2 negative
  38. 38 Christie v Leachinsky [1947] UKHL 2 71 citing 2 negative
  39. 39 R (on the application of M) v Slough Borough Council [2008] UKHL 52 71 citing
  40. 40 R v Sussex Justices; Ex parte McCarthy [1923] EWHC KB 1 69 citing
  41. 41 Jones v National Coal Board [1957] EWCA Civ 3 68 citing
  42. 42 Rookes v Barnard [1964] UKHL 1 68 citing 2 negative
  43. 43 Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Qld) v Livingston [1964] UKPC 2 67 citing
  44. 44 Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG [1998] UKHL 52 67 citing 1 negative
  45. 45 Gestmin SGPS SA v Credit Suisse (UK) Ltd [2013] EWHC 3560 67 citing
  46. 46 Hussien v Chong Fook Kam [1969] UKPC 26 64 citing
  47. 47 Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd [1980] UKHL 2 64 citing 1 negative
  48. 48 Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham Urban District Council [1956] UKHL 3 63 citing
  49. 49 D v NSPCC [1977] UKHL 1 60 citing 1 negative
  50. 50 Gillett v Holt [2000] EWCA 45 60 citing

Counts are judgments in this index citing the case, by neutral or report citation; one judgment counts once however often it cites the case. Treatment is read from the words of the citing sentence and is a guide only: open a case to see each citing judgment.