Home

Pinpoint · Most cited cases

Most cited

Cases ranked by how many judgments in Pinpoint’s index cite them, with how many of those distinguished, doubted, did not follow or overruled them.

United Kingdom · ranks 551–600

  1. 551 Nederlandse Reassurantie Groep Holding NV v Bacon & Woodrow [1995] 1 All ER 976 19 citing
  2. 552 GE Capital Corporate Finance Group Ltd v Bankers Trust Co [1995] 1 WLR 172 19 citing 1 negative
  3. 553 Tan Te Lam v Superintendent of Tai A Chau Detention Centre [1997] AC 97 19 citing
  4. 554 Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] UKHL 14 19 citing
  5. 555 Adan v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1998] 2 WLR 702 19 citing 2 negative
  6. 556 Karanakaran v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2000] 3 All ER 449 19 citing
  7. 557 Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Constabulary [2001] UKHL 29 19 citing
  8. 558 Gill v Woodall [2010] EWCA Civ 1430 19 citing
  9. 559 Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27 19 citing
  10. 560 Lennon v Gibson and Howes Ltd [1919] UKPCHCA 2 18 citing
  11. 561 Attorney-General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel Ltd [1920] AC 508 18 citing
  12. 562 Leeds Industrial Co-operative Society Ltd v Slack [1924] AC 851 18 citing
  13. 563 Admiralty Commissioners v SS Susquehanna [1926] AC 655 18 citing
  14. 564 Lake v Simmons [1927] AC 487 18 citing
  15. 565 Owners of Dredger Liesbosch v Owners of Steamship Edison [1933] AC 449 18 citing
  16. 566 Vandepitte v Preferred Accident Insurance Corporation of New York [1933] AC 70 18 citing
  17. 567 Wilsons and Clyde Coal Co v English [1938] AC 57 18 citing
  18. 568 London Passenger Transport Board v Moscrop [1942] AC 332 18 citing
  19. 569 Kemsley v Foot [1952] AC 345 18 citing
  20. 570 Pilkington v Wood [1953] Ch 770 18 citing
  21. 571 Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Southport Corporation [1956] AC 218 18 citing
  22. 572 Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith [1961] AC 290 18 citing
  23. 573 Attorney-General (Gambia) v N'Jie [1961] AC 617 18 citing
  24. 574 Australian Blue Metal Ltd v Hughes [1963] AC 74 18 citing
  25. 575 Fraser v BN Furman (Productions) Ltd [1967] 1 WLR 898 18 citing
  26. 576 Slough Estates Ltd v Slough Borough Council [1968] Ch 299 18 citing
  27. 577 C H Giles & Co Ltd v Morris [1972] 1 WLR 307 18 citing
  28. 578 John Bishop (Caterers) Ltd v The National Union Bank Ltd [1973] 1 All ER 707 18 citing 2 negative
  29. 579 Inc v Kuys [1973] 1 WLR 1126 18 citing
  30. 580 R v Kilbourne [1973] AC 729 18 citing
  31. 581 Bristol-Myers Co v Beecham Group Ltd [1974] AC 646 18 citing
  32. 582 Ayerst (Inspector of Taxes) v C & K (Construction) Ltd [1976] AC 167 18 citing 4 negative
  33. 583 R v Sang [1979] UKHL 3 18 citing
  34. 584 Bartlett v Barclays Trust Co Ltd (No 1) [1980] Ch 515 18 citing
  35. 585 Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888 18 citing
  36. 586 Exxon Corporation v Exxon Insurance Consultants International Ltd [1982] Ch 119 18 citing
  37. 587 Foster v Tyne and Wear County Council [1986] 1 All ER 567 18 citing
  38. 588 Pittalis v Sherefettin [1986] QB 868 18 citing
  39. 589 Films Rover International Ltd v Cannon Film Sales Ltd [1987] 1 WLR 670 18 citing
  40. 590 Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd [1987] AC 241 18 citing
  41. 591 Societe Nationale Industrielle Aerospatiale v Lee Kui Jak [1987] AC 871 18 citing
  42. 592 Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers Ltd [1992] UKHL 6 18 citing
  43. 593 M v Home Office [1993] UKHL 5 18 citing
  44. 594 T v Home Secretary [1996] AC 742 18 citing
  45. 595 Thompson v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [1998] QB 498 18 citing
  46. 596 Bourns Inc v Raychem Corporation [1999] 3 All ER 154 18 citing
  47. 597 Inco Europe Ltd v First Choice Distribution [2000] 2 All ER 109 18 citing
  48. 598 Arthur JS Hall & Co v Simons [2000] 3 WLR 543 18 citing
  49. 599 Locabail (UK) Ltd v Bayfield Properties Ltd [2000] QB 451 18 citing
  50. 600 Attorney-General v Blake [2000] UKHL 45 18 citing

Counts are judgments in this index citing the case, by neutral or report citation; one judgment counts once however often it cites the case. Treatment is read from the words of the citing sentence and is a guide only: open a case to see each citing judgment.