Home

Pinpoint · Most cited cases

Most cited

Cases ranked by how many judgments in Pinpoint’s index cite them, with how many of those distinguished, doubted, did not follow or overruled them.

United Kingdom · ranks 101–150

  1. 101 Inco Europe Ltd v First Choice Distribution [2000] UKHL 15 39 citing
  2. 102 Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 39 citing 2 negative
  3. 103 Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Todd [2004] UKPC 39 39 citing
  4. 104 OBG Ltd v Allan [2007] UKHL 21 39 citing 3 negative
  5. 105 Giles v Thompson [1993] UKHL 2 38 citing
  6. 106 Medcalf v Mardell [2002] UKHL 27 38 citing
  7. 107 Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No 6) [2004] UKHL 48 38 citing
  8. 108 McPhail v Doulton [1970] UKHL 1 37 citing
  9. 109 Waugh v British Railways Board [1979] UKHL 2 37 citing 1 negative
  10. 110 Cobbe v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd [2008] UKHL 55 37 citing 1 negative
  11. 111 Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed Co Ltd v Veitch [1941] UKHL 2 36 citing
  12. 112 Universe Tankships Inc of Monrovia v International Transport Workers Federation [1981] UKHL 9 35 citing
  13. 113 Tangerine Confectionery Ltd and Veolia ES (UK) Ltd v R [2011] EWCA Crim 2015 35 citing
  14. 114 McGraddie v McGraddie [2013] UKSC 58 35 citing
  15. 115 Attorney-General (Cth) v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd [1913] UKPCHCA 2 33 citing
  16. 116 Bonython v Commonwealth [1950] UKPCHCA 3 33 citing
  17. 117 BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings [1977] UKPCHCA 1 33 citing
  18. 118 Attorney-General (Hong Kong) v Ng Yuen Shiu [1983] UKPC 2 33 citing
  19. 119 R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex parte Simms [1999] UKHL 33 33 citing
  20. 120 Fuller v Strum [2001] EWCA Civ 1879 33 citing
  21. 121 Januzi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] UKHL 5 33 citing
  22. 122 Burmah Oil Co Ltd v Bank of England [1979] UKHL 4 32 citing
  23. 123 Bushell v Secretary of State for the Environment [1980] UKHL 1 32 citing 1 negative
  24. 124 Attorney-General (Cth) v The Queen [1957] UKPCHCA 1 31 citing
  25. 125 El Ajou v Dollar Land Holdings plc [1993] EWCA Civ 4 31 citing
  26. 126 Shephard v Cartwright [1954] UKHL 2 30 citing
  27. 127 Parry v Cleaver [1969] UKHL 2 30 citing
  28. 128 Bilta (UK) Ltd (in liq) v Nazir (No 2) [2015] UKSC 23 30 citing
  29. 129 Black-Clawson International Ltd v Papierwerke Waldhof-Aschaffenburg AG [1975] UKHL 2 29 citing
  30. 130 Mandla v Dowell Lee [1982] UKHL 7 29 citing
  31. 131 Prebble v Television New Zealand Ltd [1994] UKPC 25 29 citing 2 negative
  32. 132 Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [1999] UKHL 45 29 citing 1 negative
  33. 133 Schmidt v Rosewood Trust Ltd [2003] UKPC 26 28 citing 3 negative
  34. 134 Jones v Padavatton [1968] EWCA Civ 4 27 citing 1 negative
  35. 135 New Zealand Shipping Co Ltd v A M Satterthwaite & Co Ltd [1974] UKPC 1 27 citing
  36. 136 Sidaway v Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital [1985] UKHL 1 27 citing
  37. 137 Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v Argyll Stores (Holdings) Ltd [1997] UKHL 17 27 citing
  38. 138 Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation v Privalov [2007] UKHL 40 27 citing 2 negative
  39. 139 R v Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribunal; Ex parte Shaw [1951] EWCA Civ 1 26 citing 1 negative
  40. 140 Alphacell Ltd v Woodward [1972] UKHL 4 26 citing 1 negative
  41. 141 Beaufort Developments (NI) Ltd v Gilbert-Ash NI Ltd [1998] UKHL 19 26 citing
  42. 142 R v Bow Street Magistrate; Ex parte Pinochet (No 2) [1999] UKHL 1 26 citing 1 negative
  43. 143 Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Co (Nos 4 and 5) [2002] UKHL 19 26 citing
  44. 144 Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 26 citing
  45. 145 Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 26 citing
  46. 146 Bourhill v Young [1942] UKHL 5 25 citing
  47. 147 Saunders v Anglia Building Society [1970] UKHL 5 25 citing
  48. 148 White v Jones [1995] UKHL 5 25 citing 1 negative
  49. 149 Harley v McDonald [2001] UKPC 18 25 citing
  50. 150 Simon v Byford [2014] EWCA Civ 280 25 citing

Counts are judgments in this index citing the case, by neutral or report citation; one judgment counts once however often it cites the case. Treatment is read from the words of the citing sentence and is a guide only: open a case to see each citing judgment.