Home

Pinpoint · Most cited cases

Most cited

Cases ranked by how many judgments in Pinpoint’s index cite them, with how many of those distinguished, doubted, did not follow or overruled them.

United Kingdom · ranks 351–400

  1. 351 Rogers v Home Secretary [1973] AC 388 28 citing
  2. 352 United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Burnley Borough Council [1978] AC 904 28 citing
  3. 353 Siskina (Cargo Owners) v Distos Compania Naviera SA [1979] AC 210 28 citing
  4. 354 Maschinenfabrik v South India Shipping Corporation Ltd [1981] AC 909 28 citing
  5. 355 Buttes Gas & Oil Co v Hammer (No 3) [1981] QB 223 28 citing
  6. 356 Dunlop v Woollahra Municipal Council [1982] AC 158 28 citing
  7. 357 Elguzouli-Daf v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [1995] QB 335 28 citing
  8. 358 Schmidt v Rosewood Trust Ltd [2003] UKPC 26 28 citing 3 negative
  9. 359 Connecticut Fire Insurance Co v Kavanagh [1892] AC 473 27 citing
  10. 360 North Western Salt Co Ltd v Electrolytic Alkali Co Ltd [1914] AC 461 27 citing
  11. 361 Morris v Baron & Co [1918] AC 1 27 citing
  12. 362 Wilson v United Counties Bank Ltd [1920] AC 102 27 citing
  13. 363 Pointe Gourde Quarrying and Transport Co Ltd v Sub-Intendent of Crown Lands [1947] AC 565 27 citing
  14. 364 British Transport Commission v Gourley [1956] AC 185 27 citing
  15. 365 Kitchen v Royal Air Force Association [1958] 1 WLR 563 27 citing
  16. 366 Robophone Facilities Ltd v Blank [1966] 1 WLR 1428 27 citing
  17. 367 Jones v Padavatton [1968] EWCA Civ 4 27 citing 1 negative
  18. 368 New Zealand Shipping Co Ltd v A M Satterthwaite & Co Ltd [1974] UKPC 1 27 citing
  19. 369 Sirros v Moore [1975] QB 118 27 citing
  20. 370 Wallersteiner v Moir (No 2) [1975] QB 373 27 citing
  21. 371 Alltrans Express Ltd v CVA Holdings Ltd [1984] 1 WLR 394 27 citing
  22. 372 Sidaway v Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital [1985] UKHL 1 27 citing
  23. 373 Scharer v Counting Instruments Ltd [1986] 1 WLR 615 27 citing
  24. 374 Polly Peck (Holdings) Plc v Trelford [1986] QB 1000 27 citing
  25. 375 Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v Argyll Stores (Holdings) Ltd [1997] UKHL 17 27 citing
  26. 376 Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation v Privalov [2007] UKHL 40 27 citing 2 negative
  27. 377 Dilworth v Commissioner of Stamps [1899] AC 99 26 citing
  28. 378 William Brandt's Sons & Co v Dunlop Rubber Co Ltd [1905] AC 454 26 citing
  29. 379 Crane v Hegeman-Harris Co Inc [1939] 1 All ER 662 26 citing
  30. 380 Commonwealth v Bank of New South Wales [1950] AC 235 26 citing
  31. 381 Ministry of Health v Simpson [1951] AC 251 26 citing
  32. 382 R v Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribunal; Ex parte Shaw [1951] EWCA Civ 1 26 citing
  33. 383 DC Thomson & Co Ltd v Deakin [1952] Ch 646 26 citing
  34. 384 Re A Solicitor's Clerk [1957] 1 WLR 1219 26 citing
  35. 385 Wenlock v Moloney [1965] 1 WLR 1238 26 citing
  36. 386 Alphacell Ltd v Woodward [1972] UKHL 4 26 citing 1 negative
  37. 387 Central Asbestos Co Ltd v Dodd [1973] AC 518 26 citing
  38. 388 BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings [1977] UKPCHCA 1 26 citing
  39. 389 Belmont Finance Corporation v Williams Furniture Ltd (No 2) [1980] 1 All ER 393 26 citing
  40. 390 Chanel Ltd v F W Woolworth & Co [1981] 1 All ER 745 26 citing
  41. 391 Re Preston [1985] AC 835 26 citing
  42. 392 Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] AC 1074 26 citing
  43. 393 Hall (Inspector of Taxes) v Lorimer [1992] 1 WLR 939 26 citing
  44. 394 Beaufort Developments (NI) Ltd v Gilbert-Ash NI Ltd [1998] UKHL 19 26 citing
  45. 395 R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate; Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2) [1999] UKHL 1 26 citing 1 negative
  46. 396 Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Co (Nos 4 and 5) [2002] UKHL 19 26 citing
  47. 397 Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 26 citing
  48. 398 Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 26 citing
  49. 399 Inland Revenue Commissioners v Raphael [1935] AC 96 25 citing
  50. 400 Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1942] 1 All ER 378 25 citing

Counts are judgments in this index citing the case, by neutral or report citation; one judgment counts once however often it cites the case. Treatment is read from the words of the citing sentence and is a guide only: open a case to see each citing judgment.