Pinpoint · Judgment search

Rio Pioneer Gravel Co Pty Ltd v Warringah Shire Council

(1969) 17 LGRA 153

1969 · Find the judgment

Cited by 7 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 2 Cited 5

1999: 1 citing judgment 2001: 1 citing judgment 2002: 1 citing judgment 2003: 2 citing judgments 2006: 1 citing judgment 2014: 1 citing judgment 1969 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Robinson and Ors v Pittwater Council [1999] NSWLEC 200 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · judgment
  2. Prince v North Sydney Council [2001] NSWLEC 165 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  3. Beaton v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2002] NSWLEC 98 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · judgment
  4. Gee v Port Stephens Council [2003] NSWLEC 260 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 41× · judgment
  5. Broadwater Action Group Inc v Richmond Valley Council & Anor [No. 2] [2003] NSWLEC 289 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 15× · judgment
  6. Grant v Kiama Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 70 Applied or followed Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 79× · judgment
  7. Mike George Planning Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council (No 4) [2014] NSWLEC 187 Applied or followed Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 5× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.