Pinpoint · Judgment search

Re Manion; Ex parte Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

(1979) 23 ALR 270

1979 · Find the judgment

Cited by 8 indexed judgments

All Cited 8

1995: 1 citing judgment 1996: 1 citing judgment 1997: 1 citing judgment 1999: 2 citing judgments 2000: 1 citing judgment 2007: 1 citing judgment 2011: 1 citing judgment 1979 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Yu, Patrick Ho Hang v Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Ltd (in liq) [1995] FCA 889 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. Re Kostezky, Nicholas Ilya Ex Parte Milder Elfman Szmerling Krycer Pty [1996] FCA 455 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Croft, Terry Fortescue v Poli, Armida Croft, Terry Fortescue v Ex Parte Armida Poli [1997] FCA 326 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  4. Glass v Demarco [1999] FCA 481 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  5. Northam v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1999] FCA 544 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  6. Australian Steel Company (Operations) Pty Ltd v Lewis [2000] FCA 1915 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 44× · judgment
  7. Irani v Hollyburton UK Limited [2007] FCA 1447 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  8. Autron Pty Ltd v Benk [2011] FCAFC 93 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 4× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.