Pinpoint · Judgment search

Yeomans v Walker

(1986) 5 NSWLR 378

1986 · Find the judgment

Cited by 10 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 4 Cited 6

1996: 1 citing judgment 1998: 1 citing judgment 2002: 1 citing judgment 2005: 1 citing judgment 2006: 2 citing judgments 2007: 1 citing judgment 2009: 1 citing judgment 2016: 1 citing judgment 2017: 1 citing judgment 1986 1990 2000 2010 2020
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. In the matter of Movitor Pty Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed) (in liquidation) Sims, A M (Applicant) [1996] FCA 205 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. Pace, Charlie & Anor v Antleres Pty Ltd (in liq) [1998] FCA 2 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Naumoski v Parbery [2002] NSWSC 1097 Applied or followed Supreme Court of NSW · cited 12× · judgment
  4. Bridgeport - Advisers & Asset Managers Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 757 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 6× · judgment
  5. Hausmann v Smith [2006] NSWSC 682 Applied or followed Supreme Court of NSW · cited 12× · judgment
  6. Spalla v St George Motor Finance Ltd (No 7) [2006] FCA 1177 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  7. Acer Computer Australia Pty Limited v Carter (No 2) [2007] FCA 1943 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  8. Wabbits Pty Limited v Godfrey [2009] NSWSC 1299 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  9. Kimberley Diamonds Ltd, in the matter of Kimberley Diamond Company Pty Ltd (in liq) [2016] FCA 1016 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  10. Asden Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) v Dinoris [2017] FCAFC 117 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 4× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.