Pinpoint · Judgment search

Starcevich v Repatriation Commission

(1987) 18 FCR 221

1987 · Find the judgment

Cited by 17 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 1 Applied or followed 3 Cited 13

1995: 1 citing judgment 1996: 2 citing judgments 1997: 1 citing judgment 2000: 2 citing judgments 2001: 1 citing judgment 2002: 1 citing judgment 2003: 1 citing judgment 2004: 1 citing judgment 2005: 1 citing judgment, 1 negative 2006: 1 citing judgment 2007: 1 citing judgment 2012: 1 citing judgment 2013: 1 citing judgment 2014: 2 citing judgments 1987 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Repatriation Commission v Sheehy, Michael Brian [1995] FCA 999 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. Sheehy, Michael Brian v Repatriation Commission [1996] FCA 417 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Whiteman, P R v Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs [1996] FCA 845 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  4. Repatriation Commission v Fox, William Henry [1997] FCA 737 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  5. Forbes v Repatriation Commission [2000] FCA 328 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 16× · judgment
  6. Hill v Repatriation Commission [2000] FCA 929 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  7. Spargo v Repatriation Commission [2001] FCA 1763 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  8. Hendy v Repatriation Commission [2002] FCA 602 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  9. Repatriation Commission v Van Heteren [2003] FCA 888 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  10. Repatriation Commission v Graham [2004] FCA 1287 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  11. Wright v Repatriation Commission [2005] FCA 7 Distinguished Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  12. Repatriation Commission v Butcher [2006] FCA 811 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  13. Repatriation Commission v Butcher [2007] FCAFC 36 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 15× · judgment
  14. Smith v Repatriation Commission [2012] FCA 1043 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  15. Simos v Repatriation Commission [2013] FCA 607 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  16. Smith v Repatriation Commission [2014] FCAFC 53 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 12× · judgment
  17. Sheldon v Repatriation Commission [2014] FCA 1388 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.