R v GAS

(1998) 3 VR 862

1998 · Find the judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

Robinson v R [2006] NSWCCA 192 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 38× · judgment
SIEDERS, Johan v R; SOMSRI, Yotchomchin v R [2008] NSWCCA 187 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 11× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Robinson v R [2006] NSWCCA 192 Cited cited 38×
- New Zealand v Moloney [2006] FCAFC 143 Cited cited 26×
- Sepulveda v R [2006] NSWCCA 379 Cited cited 16×
- SMALE, Garry Anthony v R [2007] NSWCCA 328 Cited cited 15×
- Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Yeo and Anor [2008] NSWSC 953 Cited cited 20×
- Fleming v R [2009] NSWCCA 233 Cited cited 16×
- GAR v R (No 2) [2010] NSWCCA 164 Cited cited 16×
- Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Wililo and Anor [2012] NSWSC 713 Cited cited 24×
SIEDERS, Johan v R; SOMSRI, Yotchomchin v R [2008] NSWCCA 187 Cited cited 11×
- Qoro v R [2008] NSWCCA 220 Cited cited 12×
- Clark v R [2010] NSWCCA 94 Cited cited 11×
- GAR v R (No 2) [2010] NSWCCA 164 Cited cited 16×
- Sheen v R [2011] NSWCCA 259 Cited cited 11×
- NSW Aboriginal Land Council v Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act (Goomallee) [2012] NSWLEC 1 Cited cited 7×
- REGINA v MOORE [2015] NSWCCA 316 Cited cited 14×
- A2 v R; Magennis v R; Vaziri v R [2018] NSWCCA 174 Cited cited 16×

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.