Pinpoint · Judgment search

Kural v The Queen

[1987] HCA 16 ; (1987) 162 CLR 502

High Court of Australia · 1987 · Find the judgment

Cited by 41 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 2 Cited 39

1995: 1 citing judgment 1996: 1 citing judgment 1997: 2 citing judgments 1998: 1 citing judgment 2001: 4 citing judgments 2002: 4 citing judgments 2003: 2 citing judgments 2004: 2 citing judgments 2005: 3 citing judgments 2006: 1 citing judgment 2008: 1 citing judgment 2010: 2 citing judgments 2015: 2 citing judgments 2016: 3 citing judgments 2017: 2 citing judgments 2019: 3 citing judgments 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 2 citing judgments 2026: 2 citing judgments 1987 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. KBT v The Queen [1997] HCA 54 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 53× · judgment
  2. BRS v The Queen [1997] HCA 47 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 71× · judgment
  3. Gipp v The Queen [1998] HCA 21 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 143× · judgment
  4. Chief of the General Staff v Stuart, Lieutenant Colonel Russell Alexander [1995] FCA 1005 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  5. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Nationwide News Pty Ltd Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Smartcom Telecommunications Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 687 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  6. Regina v Vergara [2001] NSWCCA 24 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  7. Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 510 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 31× · judgment
  8. Byron Shire Council v The Rising Damp Corporation Pty Limited [2001] NSWLEC 260 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  9. Regina v El Hassan [2001] NSWCCA 543 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  10. R v Lu Lu [2002] NSWSC 14 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  11. R v El-Zeyat [2002] NSWCCA 138 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  12. R v LYBEROPOULOS [2002] NSWCCA 280 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 10× · judgment
  13. R v Muradian [2002] NSWCCA 371 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  14. Leung v Regina [2003] NSWCCA 51 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  15. Regina v Ruiz-Avila [2003] NSWCCA 264 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  16. Regina v Narongchai Saengsai-Or [2004] NSWCCA 108 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 22× · judgment
  17. REGINA v KALDOR [2004] NSWCCA 425 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 41× · judgment
  18. Tabe v The Queen [2005] HCA 59 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  19. Regina v Kanaan [2005] NSWCCA 385 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 34× · judgment
  20. R v Anna Zhang [2005] NSWCCA 437 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 49× · judgment
  21. Chi Thanh Cao v R [2006] NSWCCA 89 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  22. SIEDERS, Johan v R; SOMSRI, Yotchomchin v R [2008] NSWCCA 187 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 11× · judgment
  23. CRYER, Jamie Oliver v R [2010] NSWCCA 18 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  24. Australian Building & Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2010] FCA 784 (Corrigenda dated 23 July 2010 and 26 July 2010) [2010] FCA 784 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 16× · judgment
  25. Malicki v R; R v Malicki [2015] NSWCCA 162 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  26. Fraser v Health Care Complaints Commission [2015] NSWCA 421 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 12× · judgment
  27. Health Care Complaints Commission v Flekser [2016] NSWCATOD 1 Cited NCAT Occupational · cited 10× · judgment
  28. Smith, Maltimore v R [2016] NSWCCA 93 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  29. Siafakas v R [2016] NSWCCA 100 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  30. R v JDX; JDX v R [2017] NSWCCA 9 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 18× · judgment
  31. Smith v The Queen [2017] HCA 19 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  32. GM Global Technology Operations LLC v S.S.S. Auto Parts Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 97 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  33. McGlone v R [2019] NSWCCA 252 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  34. Anderson v R [2019] NSWCCA 256 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  35. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v The Country Care Group Pty Ltd (Ruling No 3) [2020] FCA 1714 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  36. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v BlueScope Steel Limited (No 3) [2021] FCA 1147 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  37. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Delta Building Automation Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 880 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  38. R v Davis (Pre-trial ruling) [2024] NSWDC 5 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  39. Salameh v R [2024] NSWCCA 239 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  40. Zip Co Limited v Firstmac Limited [2026] HCA 16 Cited High Court of Australia · judgment
  41. The King v Ko [2026] HCA 29 Cited High Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.