Federal Court of Australia · 1 August 1995 · Official judgment
No indexed judgment cites this case yet.
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[1897] AC 180 Cited cited 39×[1932] 1 KB 254 Cited cited 8×[1949] HCA 1 Cited cited 909×[1964] HCA 69 Cited cited 2,085×(1973) 1 ALR 497 Cited cited 30×[1985] 2 NSWLR 361 Cited cited 1×(1986) 64 ALR 347 Cited cited 76×Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
[1897] AC 180
Cited cited 39× [1932] 1 KB 254
Cited cited 8× [1949] HCA 1
Cited cited 909× [1964] HCA 69
Cited cited 2,085× (1973) 1 ALR 497
Cited cited 30× [1985] 2 NSWLR 361
Cited (1986) 64 ALR 347
Cited cited 76× Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.