Pinpoint · Judgment search

Puglisi, Joseph v Australian Fisheries Management Authority

[1996] FCA 618

Federal Court of Australia · 24 July 1996 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (15)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Banks v Transport Regulation Board (Vic) (1968) 119 CLR 222 Cited cited 33×
  2. Schmidt v Secretary of State for Home Affairs (1969) 2 Ch 149 Cited cited 2×
  3. Heatley v Tasmanian Racing and Gaming Commission [1977] HCA 39 Cited cited 54×
  4. Ex parte St. Germain (No 2) [1979] 1 WLR 1041 Cited
  5. Haj-Ismail v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1981) 56 FLR 67 Cited cited 2×
  6. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Haj-Ismail (1982) 57 FLR 133 Cited cited 4×
  7. FAI Insurances Ltd v Winneke [1982] HCA 26 Applied or followed cited 124×
  8. Attorney-General of Hong-Kong v Ng Yuen Shiu (1983) 2 AC 629 Applied or followed cited 2×
  9. Attorney-General (Hong Kong) v Ng Yuen Shiu [1983] UKPC 2 Cited cited 33×
  10. Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] 1 AC 374 Cited cited 19×
  11. Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81 Applied or followed cited 1,205×
  12. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×
  13. Peverill v Backstram (1994) 127 ALR 197 Cited
  14. Cunliffe v The Commonwealth [1994] HCA 44 Cited cited 108×
  15. Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh [1995] HCA 20 Cited cited 502×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.