Pinpoint · Judgment search

Bowler, Bruce William & Anor v Hilda Pty Ltd & Ors

[1996] FCA 928

Federal Court of Australia · 25 October 1996 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (17)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34 Cited cited 3,164×
  2. Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8 Cited cited 2,918×
  3. Jones v Dumbrell [1981] VR 199 Cited cited 11×
  4. Yorke v Lucas [1985] HCA 65 Cited cited 623×
  5. Gould v Vaggelas [1985] HCA 75 Cited cited 434×
  6. James v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1986) 64 ALR 347 Cited cited 76×
  7. Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (Inc) [1986] FCA 382 Cited cited 89×
  8. Elders Trustee and Executor Co Ltd v E G Reeves Pty Ltd [1987] FCA 332 Cited cited 80×
  9. Famel Pty Ltd v Burswood Management Ltd (1989) 11 ATPR 40 Cited cited 23×
  10. SS Pharmaceutical Co Ltd v Qantas Airways Ltd [1991] 1 Lloyds LR 288 Cited
  11. Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd [1992] HCA 66 Cited cited 703×
  12. Cummings v Lewis (1993) 113 ALR 285 Cited cited 32×
  13. John G Glass Real Estate Pty Ltd v Karawi Constructions Pty Ltd (1993) 15 ATPR 41 Cited cited 10×
  14. Cummings v Lewis [1993] FCA 190 Cited cited 122×
  15. Zhang v Minister for Immigration [1993] FCA 715 Cited cited 49×
  16. Ting v Blanche [1993] FCA 781 Cited cited 59×
  17. Bartlett v Swan Television & Radio Broadcasters Pty Ltd (1995) 17 ATPR 41 Cited cited 15×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.