Federal Court of Australia · 18 September 1997 · Official judgment
Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited
[1998] FCA 776
Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
[1999] FCA 1610
Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
[2003] FCA 536
Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
[2006] FCA 1663
Distinguished Federal Court of Australia · cited 29× · judgment
[2015] FCA 724
Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
(1937) 57 CLR 448 Cited cited 10×(1948) 16 RPC 429 Cited cited 1×(1960) 60 SR (NSW) 576 Cited cited 3×[1972] 1 WLR 729 Cited cited 41×[1981] 1 NSWLR 273 Cited cited 9×[1984] HCA 73 Cited cited 146×[1987] FCA 667 Cited cited 32×(1988) 83 ALR 403 Cited cited 10×(1988) 20 FCR 314 Cited cited 5×(1988) 16 IPR 365 Cited cited 2×[1992] FCA 176 Cited cited 137×(1996) 66 FCR 451 Cited cited 19×Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.
[1998] FCA 776 Cited[1999] FCA 1610 Cited cited 2×[2006] FCA 1663 Distinguished cited 29×[2009] FCA 891 Applied or followed cited 29×[2010] FCAFC 58 Cited cited 49×[2010] FCA 664 Cited cited 39×[2011] FCA 94 Not followed cited 19×[2012] FCA 252 Distinguished cited 33×[2012] FCAFC 159 Cited cited 39×[2015] FCAFC 156 Applied or followed cited 24×Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
(1937) 57 CLR 448
Cited cited 10× (1948) 16 RPC 429
Cited (1960) 60 SR (NSW) 576
Cited cited 3× [1972] 1 WLR 729
Cited cited 41× [1981] 1 NSW LR 273
Cited [1981] 1 NSWLR 273
Cited cited 9× [1984] HCA 73
Cited cited 146× [1987] FCA 667
Cited cited 32× (1988) 16 IPR 365
Cited cited 2× (1988) 20 FCR 314
Cited cited 5× (1988) 83 ALR 403
Cited cited 10× [1992] FCA 176
Cited cited 137× (1996) 66 FCR 451
Cited cited 19× Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.