Pinpoint · Judgment search

Satheeskumar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs

[1999] FCA 1285

Federal Court of Australia · 23 August 1999 · Official judgment

Cited by 18 indexed judgments

All Cited 18

1999: 2 citing judgments 2000: 2 citing judgments 2001: 5 citing judgments 2002: 2 citing judgments 2003: 3 citing judgments 2004: 1 citing judgment 2014: 1 citing judgment 2015: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 1999 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Dhiman v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1291 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  2. Grant v Repatriation Commission [1999] FCA 1629 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 38× · judgment
  3. Zheng v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 670 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  4. Chen v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1901 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 51× · judgment
  5. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Sarrazola [2001] FCA 263 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 53× · judgment
  6. Budworth v Repatriation Commission [2001] FCA 317 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  7. Abdul Raheem v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 940 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  8. Kalala v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1594 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 28× · judgment
  9. Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1802 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 279× · judgment
  10. Ahvazi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 279 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  11. Hendy v Repatriation Commission [2002] FCA 602 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  12. VHAU of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 376 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  13. SDAQ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 120 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 54× · judgment
  14. Applicant VBB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1141 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  15. SVRB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1176 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  16. Watkins v Repatriation Commission [2014] FCA 787 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  17. Summers v Repatriation Commission [2015] FCAFC 36 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 55× · judgment
  18. EOC20 v Judges of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia [2021] FCA 758 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (2)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Paramananthan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 160 ALR 24 Applied or followed cited 67×
  2. Sellamuthu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 247 Distinguished cited 170×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.