PinpointRegina v Fraser
NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 19 July 1999 · Official judgment
Cited by 2 indexed judgments
Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited
-
R v Binnie
[2000] NSWCCA 483Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment -
R v Marinos
[2003] NSWCCA 136Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
Tree of authority
Built upon
Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.
R v Binnie
[2000] NSWCCA 483Cited cited 1×- Dyer v R
[2011] NSWCCA 185Cited cited 21×
- Dyer v R
R v Marinos
[2003] NSWCCA 136Cited cited 3×- R v Ronal Penalosa-Munoz
[2004] NSWCCA 33Cited cited 3× - SIMPSON v R
[2010] NSWCCA 225Cited - R v Windley
[2023] NSWDC 662Cited
- R v Ronal Penalosa-Munoz
How the citator works
Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.