Pinpoint · Judgment search

Regina v Dang

[1999] NSWCCA 42

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 2 March 1999 · Official judgment

Cited by 12 indexed judgments

All Cited 12

2000: 2 citing judgments 2005: 1 citing judgment 2009: 1 citing judgment 2011: 1 citing judgment 2013: 2 citing judgments 2014: 1 citing judgment 2017: 2 citing judgments 2018: 1 citing judgment 2024: 1 citing judgment 1999 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Frawley [2000] NSWSC 1128 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  2. R v Valera [2000] NSWSC 1220 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  3. R v Vuni [2005] NSWSC 184 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  4. REGINA v SF [2009] NSWSC 1069 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  5. Inspector Lancaster v M L Colturi Sawmills Pty Ltd [2011] NSWIRComm 47 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 9× · judgment
  6. R v Minna [2013] NSWDC 104 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  7. R v Loveridge [2013] NSWSC 1638 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  8. R v Hines (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 1273 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 38× · judgment
  9. R v Farhad Qaumi, Mumtaz Qaumi & Jamil Qaumi (Sentence) [2017] NSWSC 774 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 12× · judgment
  10. R v Brooks (No.5) [2017] NSWSC 824 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 7× · judgment
  11. Sheiles v R [2018] NSWCCA 285 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  12. R v Mehajer [2024] NSWDC 240 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (3)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Khan (1996) 86 A Crim R 552 Cited cited 9×
  2. R v Previtera (1997) 94 A Crim R 76 Cited cited 318×
  3. R v Bollen (1998) 99 A Crim R 510 Cited cited 74×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.