Pinpoint · Judgment search

AMCOR LIMITED t/as AUSTRALIAN PAPER MANUFACTURERS v WATSON & ANOR

[2000] NSWCA 21

NSW Court of Appeal · 3 March 2000 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2007: 1 citing judgment 2024: 1 citing judgment 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Lauren Fisher by her Tutor Janice Fisher v Dr Raymond Marin & Anor [2007] NSWSC 1411 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 5× · judgment
  2. Gemi Nominees Pty Ltd v Chamoun [2024] NSWSC 926 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (7)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Gibbons v Wright [1954] HCA 17 Cited cited 110×
  2. Harvey v Phillips [1956] HCA 27 Cited cited 170×
  3. West v AGC (Advances) Ltd (1986) 5 NSWLR 610 Applied or followed cited 174×
  4. Lewis v Combell Constructions Pty Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 528 Cited cited 39×
  5. Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon [1991] NSWCA 19 Applied or followed cited 132×
  6. Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon [1993] HCA 4 Cited cited 259×
  7. WATSON v PAPER INDUSTRY ENGINEERS PTY LTD [1999] NSWSC 98 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.