Pinpoint · Judgment search

Cheung v The Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales

[2000] NSWSC 1062 ; (2000) 111 LGERA 353

Supreme Court of NSW · 16 November 2000 · Official judgment

Cited by 19 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 3 Cited 16

2000: 1 citing judgment 2001: 2 citing judgments 2002: 2 citing judgments, 1 negative 2004: 3 citing judgments 2007: 4 citing judgments 2008: 3 citing judgments, 2 negative 2009: 3 citing judgments 2024: 1 citing judgment 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Brooks-Maher -v- Cheung [2000] NSWADT 57 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · judgment
  2. Black -v- General Manager, Bathurst City Council [2001] NSWADT 139 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 9× · judgment
  3. Y -v- Director General, Department of Education & Training [2001] NSWADT 149 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 57× · judgment
  4. BQ -v- Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2002] NSWADT 64 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 19× · judgment
  5. Wilmshurst v Vice Chancellor, Macquarie University [2002] NSWADT 196 Distinguished Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 14× · judgment
  6. Waite v General Manager, Hornsby Shire Council [2004] NSWADT 93 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 4× · judgment
  7. Druett v Director General, Department of Community Services [2004] NSWADT 181 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 2× · judgment
  8. Isaac v Nannelli [2004] NSWADT 233 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · judgment
  9. Tringas v Quach (RLD) [2007] NSWADTAP 35 Cited ADT Appeal Panel (NSW) · cited 9× · judgment
  10. McGuirk v University of New South Wales [2007] NSWADT 258 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 12× · judgment
  11. Dezfouli v Justice Health [2007] NSWADT 262 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 9× · judgment
  12. Ferns v NSW Department of Corrective Services [2007] NSWADT 293 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 1× · judgment
  13. McDonald and anor v Director General, Department of Lands [2008] NSWADT 25 Distinguished Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 5× · judgment
  14. Sawires v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2008] NSWADT 91 Distinguished Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 5× · judgment
  15. LZ v Office of the Protective Commissioner (GD) [2008] NSWADTAP 50 Cited ADT Appeal Panel (NSW) · cited 9× · judgment
  16. McGuirk v University of New South Wales [2009] NSWADTAP 12 Cited ADT Appeal Panel (NSW) · cited 4× · judgment
  17. Corrigan & Gibson v Watson [2009] NSWADT 110 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · cited 16× · judgment
  18. Pevara Pty Ltd trading as Sophies Restaurant [2009] NSWADT 300 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · judgment
  19. Registrar Appointed Under the Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983 v Toomey [2024] NSWLEC 92 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (3)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Nile v Wood [1988] HCA 30 Cited cited 24×
  2. Robertson v Australian Electoral Commission (1993) 116 ALR 407 Cited cited 11×
  3. [2000] 111 LGERA 353 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.