PinpointR v Bellamy
Supreme Court of NSW · 11 December 2000 · Official judgment
Cited by 0 indexed judgments
No indexed judgment cites this case yet.
Tree of authority
Built on
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
- R v Rushby
(1977) 1 NSWLR 594Cited cited 70× - R v Hill
(1981) 3 A Crim R 397Cited cited 121× - R v Hayes
(1983) 11 A Crim R 187Cited cited 3× - R v Holder and Johnston
(1983) 2 NSWLR 245Cited cited 2× - Layer v Burns Philp Trustee Co Ltd
(1986) 6 NSWLR 60Cited cited 10× - Veen v The Queen (No 2)
[1988] HCA 14Cited cited 1,716× - R v Moffitt
(1990) 20 NSWLR 114Cited cited 111× - R v Dodd
(1991) 57 A Crim R 349Cited cited 385× - R v Morabito
(1992) 62 A Crim R 82Cited cited 36× - R v Clarke
(1995) 78 A Crim R 226Cited cited 25× - Pearce v The Queen
[1998] HCA 57Cited cited 1,558× REGINA v HENRY BARBER TRAN SILVER TSOUKATOS KYROGLOU JENKINS
[1999] NSWCCA 111Cited cited 1,285×- Norbis v Norbis
[1986] HCA 17Cited cited 255× - Veen v The Queen (No 2)
[1988] HCA 14Cited cited 1,716× - Latoudis v Casey
[1990] HCA 59Cited cited 1,384× - R v Fernando
(1992) 76 A Crim R 58Cited cited 274× - R v Engert
(1995) 84 A Crim R 67Cited cited 454× Oshlack v Richmond River Council
[1998] HCA 11Cited cited 2,226×- House v The King
[1936] HCA 40Cited cited 4,342× - Latoudis v Casey
[1990] HCA 59Cited cited 1,384× - Re Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin
[1997] HCA 6Cited cited 1,033× - Queensland v JL Holdings Pty Ltd
[1997] HCA 1Cited cited 613×
- House v The King
- Norbis v Norbis
Authorities cited (12)
Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
-
R v Rushby
(1977) 1 NSWLR 594Cited cited 70× -
R v Hill
(1981) 3 A Crim R 397Cited cited 121× -
R v Hayes
(1983) 11 A Crim R 187Cited cited 3× -
R v Holder and Johnston
(1983) 2 NSWLR 245Cited cited 2× -
Layer v Burns Philp Trustee Co Ltd
(1986) 6 NSWLR 60Cited cited 10× -
Veen v The Queen (No 2)
[1988] HCA 14Cited cited 1,716× -
R v Moffitt
(1990) 20 NSWLR 114Cited cited 111× -
R v Dodd
(1991) 57 A Crim R 349Cited cited 385× -
R v Morabito
(1992) 62 A Crim R 82Cited cited 36× -
R v Clarke
(1995) 78 A Crim R 226Cited cited 25× -
Pearce v The Queen
[1998] HCA 57Cited cited 1,558× -
REGINA v HENRY BARBER TRAN SILVER TSOUKATOS KYROGLOU JENKINS
[1999] NSWCCA 111Cited cited 1,285×
How the citator works
Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.