Supreme Court of NSW · 4 February 2000 · Official judgment
Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited
[2005] NSWSC 1319
Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×(1997) 94 A Crim R 67 Cited cited 3×(1998) 164 CLR 465 Cited cited 123×Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.
[2005] NSWSC 1319 Cited cited 3×[2006] NSWSC 1220 Cited cited 1×[2008] NSWSC 703 Cited cited 3×[2011] NSWCCA 91 Cited cited 8×Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
[1988] HCA 14
Cited cited 1,716× (1997) 94 A Crim R 67
Cited cited 3× (1998) 164 CLR 465
Cited cited 123× Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.