Parker v Repatriation Commission

[2001] FCA 1915

Federal Court of Australia · 12 December 2001 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1947] EWCA Civ 1 Cited cited 715×
Apthorpe v Repatriation Commission [1987] FCA 423 Cited cited 20×
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 Applied or followed cited 971×
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 Cited cited 1,750×
- Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×
- Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×
- Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×
  - Ex parte White [1966] HCA 69 Cited cited 109×
  - R v Gray; Ex parte Marsh [1985] HCA 67 Distinguished cited 118×
  - Public Service Board of New South Wales v Osmond [1986] HCA 7 Cited cited 336×
  - Dietrich v The Queen [1992] HCA 57 Cited cited 375×
- Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×
  - Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×
  - Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×
  - Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin [1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×
  - Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 456 Cited cited 845×
- Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 Cited cited 971×
- Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala [2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×

Authorities cited (4)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1947] EWCA Civ 1 Cited cited 715×
Apthorpe v Repatriation Commission [1987] FCA 423 Cited cited 20×
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 Applied or followed cited 971×
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 Cited cited 1,750×

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.