Pinpoint · Judgment search

Regina v Williams

[2004] NSWSC 189

Supreme Court of NSW · 22 March 2004 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2012: 2 citing judgments 2004 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. GOUNDAR v R [2012] NSWCCA 87 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 11× · judgment
  2. Singh v R [2012] NSWSC 637 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (15)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Regina v Hill (1980-1981) 3 A Crim R 397 Cited cited 6×
  2. In R v Hill (1980-1981) 3 ACrimR 397 Cited cited 2×
  3. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×
  4. Regina v Dodd (1991-1992) 57 A Crim R 349 Cited cited 6×
  5. Regina v Dodd (1991-1992) 57 ACrimR 349 Cited
  6. Savvas v The Queen [1995] HCA 29 Applied or followed cited 92×
  7. Regina v Storey (1997) 89 A Crim R 519 Cited cited 14×
  8. Regina v Storey (1997) 89 ACrimR 519 Cited
  9. R v Isaacs (1997) 90 A Crim R 587 Cited cited 53×
  10. R v Isaacs (1997) 90 ACrimR 587 Cited cited 3×
  11. R v Previtera (1997) 94 A Crim R 76 Cited cited 318×
  12. R v Previtera (1997) 94 ACrimR 76 Cited cited 14×
  13. Regina v Blacklidge (NSWCCA 12 December 1995, unreported) Regina v Bollen (1998-1999) 99 ACrimR 510 Cited
  14. Bollen v Regina (1998-99) 99 A Crim R 510 Cited
  15. Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64 Cited cited 1,044×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.