Pinpoint · Judgment search

Finance & Guarantee Company Pty Ltd v Auswild

[2019] VSC 664

Supreme Court of Victoria · 2019 · Find the judgment

Cited by 6 indexed judgments

All Cited 6

2020: 2 citing judgments 2021: 2 citing judgments 2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2019 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Twigg v Twigg (No 4); Lambert v Twigg Investments Pty Ltd (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 1159 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 18× · judgment
  2. In the matter of Pacific Springs Pty Limited [2020] NSWSC 1240 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 13× · judgment
  3. Thompson v Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd [2021] NSWSC 622 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  4. Kurzyp v Kurzyp [2021] NSWSC 851 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  5. Twigg v Twigg [2022] NSWCA 68 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 17× · judgment
  6. K. & A. LAIRD (N.S.W.) Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v AIDZAN Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) in its own capacity and in its capacity as trustee of the Peter Laird Trust, the Peter Alan Laird Property Trust (known as the PAL Property Trust) and the Aidzan Superannuation Fund [2023] NSWSC 603 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 5× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.