Pinpoint · Judgment search

Jones v Jackson (No 2)

[2023] NSWDC 410

District Court of NSW · 6 October 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (17)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Associated Newspapers Ltd v Dingle [1962] 2 All ER 737 Cited cited 8×
  2. Associated Newspapers Ltd v Dingle [1964] AC 371 Cited cited 50×
  3. Toomey v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1985) 1 NSWLR 291 Cited cited 21×
  4. Jones v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd (1991) 23 NSWLR 364 Cited cited 19×
  5. Slipper v British Broadcasting Corporation [1991] 1 QB 283 Cited cited 11×
  6. WEN YUE HE v AUSTRALIAN CHINESE NEWSPAPERS PTY LIMITED. [2005] NSWSC 253 Cited cited 8×
  7. Ames v Spamhaus Project Ltd [2015] 1 WLR 3409 Cited cited 3×
  8. Economou v De Freitas [2016] EWHC 1218 Cited cited 3×
  9. Sims v Jooste (No 2) [2016] WASCA 83 Cited cited 21×
  10. Dhir v Saddler [2017] EWHC 3155 Cited cited 5×
  11. Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27 Cited cited 19×
  12. Bazzi v Dutton [2022] FCAFC 84 Cited cited 22×
  13. Rader v Haines [2022] NSWCA 198 Cited cited 19×
  14. Supaphien v Chaiyabarn [2023] ACTSC 240 Cited cited 2×
  15. Selkirk v Hocking (No 2) [2023] FCA 1085 Cited cited 5×
  16. Hun v Aljazeera International (Malaysia) SDN BHD [2023] FCA 1103 Cited cited 4×
  17. Jones v Jackson [2023] NSWDC 76 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.