Home

Pinpoint · Most cited cases

Most cited

Cases ranked by how many judgments in Pinpoint’s index cite them, with how many of those distinguished, doubted, did not follow or overruled them.

United Kingdom · ranks 51–100

  1. 51 In R v G [2008] UKHL 37 60 citing
  2. 52 Gartside v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1967] UKHL 6 59 citing 1 negative
  3. 53 Conway v Rimmer [1968] UKHL 2 59 citing 1 negative
  4. 54 Banco de Portugal v Waterlow & Sons Ltd [1932] UKHL 1 58 citing
  5. 55 Brutus v Cozens [1972] UKHL 6 58 citing
  6. 56 Crabb v Arun District Council [1975] EWCA Civ 7 58 citing 1 negative
  7. 57 Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] UKHL 12 58 citing 1 negative
  8. 58 Rondel v Worsley [1967] UKHL 5 57 citing 1 negative
  9. 59 Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1994] UKHL 5 56 citing 3 negative
  10. 60 Foskett v McKeown [2000] UKHL 29 56 citing
  11. 61 Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council [1976] UKHL 6 55 citing
  12. 62 Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Co [1880] UKHL 3 54 citing
  13. 63 Kanda v Government of Malaya [1962] UKPC 2 54 citing
  14. 64 Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v The Miller Steamship Co Pty Ltd [1966] UKPC 10 54 citing
  15. 65 Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council [1996] UKHL 12 53 citing
  16. 66 O'Neill v Phillips [1999] UKHL 24 53 citing
  17. 67 Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA v Ali [2001] UKHL 8 53 citing 2 negative
  18. 68 Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2002] UKHL 12 53 citing 1 negative
  19. 69 Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1973] UKHL 6 52 citing
  20. 70 Cutts v Head [1983] EWCA Civ 8 52 citing
  21. 71 Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1987] UKHL 12 51 citing
  22. 72 Beoco Ltd v Alfa Laval Co Ltd [1993] EWCA Civ 22 51 citing
  23. 73 Masterman-Lister v Brutton & Co [2002] EWCA Civ 1889 51 citing
  24. 74 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] UKHL 1 50 citing
  25. 75 Newton v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1958] UKPCHCA 1 50 citing
  26. 76 Anns v Merton London Borough Council [1977] UKHL 4 50 citing
  27. 77 Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Citibank NA [1996] UKHL 3 50 citing
  28. 78 Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] UKHL 11 49 citing
  29. 79 Thorner v Major [2009] UKHL 18 48 citing 1 negative
  30. 80 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1892] EWCA Civ 1 47 citing 2 negative
  31. 81 Brickenden v London Loan & Savings Co [1934] UKPC 25 47 citing 4 negative
  32. 82 Re Golden Key Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 636 47 citing
  33. 83 Edwards (Inspector of Taxes) v Bairstow [1955] UKHL 3 46 citing 1 negative
  34. 84 Puhlhofer v Hillingdon London Borough Council [1986] UKHL 1 46 citing
  35. 85 Armitage v Nurse [1997] EWCA Civ 1279 46 citing 1 negative
  36. 86 Flannery v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 811 46 citing
  37. 87 Shell Co of Australia Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1930] UKPCHCA 1 44 citing 2 negative
  38. 88 Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA [1997] UKHL 23 44 citing 2 negative
  39. 89 Burstein v Times Newspapers Ltd [2000] EWCA Civ 338 44 citing
  40. 90 Wilkinson v Downton [1897] EWHC 1 43 citing
  41. 91 Lister v Romford Ice & Cold Storage Co Ltd [1956] UKHL 6 43 citing 1 negative
  42. 92 Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd [1993] UKHL 4 43 citing
  43. 93 Homburg Houtimport BV v Agrosin Private Ltd [2003] UKHL 12 43 citing
  44. 94 Quinn v Leathem [1901] UKHL 2 42 citing 2 negative
  45. 95 Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 42 citing 1 negative
  46. 96 Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd [1996] UKHL 10 41 citing 1 negative
  47. 97 Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan [1940] UKHL 2 40 citing
  48. 98 R v Buckland [2000] EWCA Crim 1 40 citing
  49. 99 Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd [1942] UKHL 4 39 citing 1 negative
  50. 100 Minister of National Revenue v Minister of Agriculture [1968] UKHL 1 39 citing 1 negative

Counts are judgments in this index citing the case, by neutral or report citation; one judgment counts once however often it cites the case. Treatment is read from the words of the citing sentence and is a guide only: open a case to see each citing judgment.