Pinpoint · Judgment search

Trade Practices Commission v George Weston Foods Ltd (No 2)

(1980) 43 FLR 55

1980 · Find the judgment

Cited by 12 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 11

1996: 2 citing judgments 1997: 1 citing judgment 1998: 1 citing judgment 2000: 2 citing judgments 2004: 1 citing judgment 2008: 1 citing judgment 2011: 2 citing judgments 2013: 1 citing judgment 2016: 1 citing judgment 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Uzcateguigaymon v Hospitality Horizons Pty Limited [1996] IRCA 666 Cited IRCA · judgment
  2. Rasomen Pty Ltd (T/as Shell Fairview Park) v The Shell Company of Australia Ltd [1996] FCA 1094 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Rasomen Pty Ltd (T/As Shell Fairview Park) v Shell Company of Australia Ltd [1997] FCA 437 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  4. Compaq Computer Australia Pty Ltd v Merry, Howard & Ors [1998] FCA 968 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 59× · judgment
  5. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Amcor Printing Papers Group Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 17 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 51× · judgment
  6. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v SIP Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2000] FCA 1487 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  7. ACCC v Leahy Petroleum [2004] FCA 1678 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 20× · judgment
  8. Cahill v Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2008] FCA 1292 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 21× · judgment
  9. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healey [2011] FCA 717 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 49× · judgment
  10. Helal v McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2011] FCA 1344 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  11. Fair Work Ombudsman v Devine Marine Group Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1135 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  12. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Egg Corporation Limited [2016] FCA 447 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.