Pinpoint · Judgment search

Rasomen Pty Ltd (T/As Shell Fairview Park) v Shell Company of Australia Ltd

[1997] FCA 437

Federal Court of Australia · 27 May 1997 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (16)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Wicklow and Wexford Railway Co. v Slattery (1878) 3 App. Cas. 1155 Cited
  2. William H Muller & Cl Algemeene v Ebbw Vale Steel Iron & Coal Co Ltd [1936] 2 All ER 1363 Cited cited 5×
  3. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  4. Hocking v Bell [1945] HCA 16 Cited cited 89×
  5. Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8 Cited cited 2,918×
  6. Barker v Charley (1962) 62 SR (NSW) 296 Cited
  7. Stevenson v Barham [1977] HCA 4 Cited cited 88×
  8. Trade Practices Commission v George Weston Foods Ltd (No 2) (1980) 43 FLR 55 Cited cited 12×
  9. Treharne v Geo. McEwin & Son Pty Ltd (1982) 44 ALR 543 Cited cited 3×
  10. Protean (Holdings) Ltd v American Home Assurance Co [1985] VR 187 Cited cited 34×
  11. Residues Treatment & Trading Co Ltd v Southern Resources Ltd (1989) 52 SASR 54 Cited cited 22×
  12. GSA Industries Pty Ltd v NT Gas Ltd (1990) 24 NSWLR 710 Cited cited 41×
  13. J-Corp Pty Ltd v Australian Builders Labourers Federated Union of Workers (1992) 111 ALR 377 Cited cited 4×
  14. Sali v SPC Ltd [1993] HCA 47 Cited cited 177×
  15. News Ltd & Ors v Australian Rugby Football League Ltd & Ors Brisbane Broncos Rugby League Football Club Ltd & Ors v Australian Rugby Football League Ltd & Ors Cowboys Rugby League Ltd v Australian Rugby Football Club Ltd & Ors [1996] FCA 870 Cited cited 269×
  16. Queensland v JL Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 71 ALJR 294 Cited cited 5×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.