Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Kastratovic

(1985) 42 SASR 59

1985 · Find the judgment

Cited by 11 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 10

1998: 1 citing judgment 2000: 1 citing judgment 2003: 4 citing judgments 2005: 1 citing judgment 2016: 2 citing judgments 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 1985 1990 2000 2010 2020
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Peters v The Queen [1998] HCA 7 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 108× · judgment
  2. Spies v The Queen [2000] HCA 43 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 101× · judgment
  3. Regina v Iannelli [2003] NSWCCA 1 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment
  4. Macleod v The Queen [2003] HCA 24 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 47× · judgment
  5. Dutton v O'Shane [2003] FCAFC 195 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 24× · judgment
  6. WILLS v PETROULIAS [2003] NSWCA 286 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 7× · judgment
  7. REGINA v Nikytas Nicholas PETROULIAS [2005] NSWCCA 75 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 15× · judgment
  8. Liristis v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2016] NSWCA 66 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  9. Jeyavel Thangavelautham v R [2016] NSWCCA 141 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 13× · judgment
  10. Selkirk v Director of Public Prosecutions [2020] NSWSC 1590 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 5× · judgment
  11. Armstrong v R [2021] NSWDC 537 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.