Pinpoint · Judgment search

Hawkins v Clayton

(1987) 164 CLR 539

1987 · Find the judgment

Cited by 9 indexed judgments

All Overruled or disapproved 1 Cited 8

2002: 2 citing judgments, 1 negative 2003: 1 citing judgment 2004: 1 citing judgment 2006: 2 citing judgments 2007: 1 citing judgment 2009: 1 citing judgment 2015: 1 citing judgment 1987 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Clutha v Millar [2002] NSWSC 362 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 10× · judgment
  2. Clutha v Millar (No.3) [2002] NSWSC 642 Overruled or disapproved Supreme Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  3. GMU Australia Pty Limited v Timothy Roger Davidson & Ors [2003] NSWSC 311 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  4. Linfox Transport (Aust) Pty Ltd v Arthur Yates & Co Ltd; Dynamic Lifter Pty Ltd v Linfox Transport (Aust) Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 943 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  5. State of New South Wales v NatWest Markets Australia No 2 Pty Limited & ors [2006] NSWSC 751 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  6. STATE OF NSW v MULCAHY [2006] NSWCA 303 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 21× · judgment
  7. Gordon Meggatt v Australian Business Limited [2007] NSWIRComm 182 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  8. Owners Corporation of Strata Plan 61896 v Multiplex Corporate Agency Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1226 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  9. Yulema Pty Ltd & Anor v Simmons & Anor [2015] NSWSC 640 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.