Pinpoint · Judgment search

Re St Leon; Ex parte National Australia Bank Ltd

(1994) 54 FCR 371

1994 · Find the judgment

Cited by 22 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 1 Applied or followed 3 Cited 18

1995: 2 citing judgments 1996: 4 citing judgments 1997: 2 citing judgments 1998: 1 citing judgment 1999: 1 citing judgment 2000: 2 citing judgments 2001: 1 citing judgment 2003: 1 citing judgment 2004: 1 citing judgment 2005: 3 citing judgments, 1 negative 2015: 1 citing judgment 2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 2 citing judgments 1994 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Ma S. & Anor v Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Ltd (In liq) [1995] FCA 636 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. Yu, Patrick Ho Hang v Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Ltd (in liq) [1995] FCA 889 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Re Christianos, Elias & Anor Ex Parte Kennedy, Louis & Anor [1996] FCA 255 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  4. Re Stephen Richard Luckins Ex Parte Columbia Pictures Industries Inc & Anor [1996] FCA 567 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  5. Re Svabec, John Ex Parte Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [1996] FCA 961 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  6. RE Celestini, Antonio EX PARTE Monte Paschi Australia Ltd [1996] FCA 1107 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  7. Abrook, R L & Anor v Peter R Bennett Investment Services Pty Ltd & Ors [1997] FCA 754 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  8. Bank of Melbourne Ltd v Hannan, Sandra Mary [1997] FCA 898 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  9. Re Lynch, Denis; Ex Parte Depela Pty Ltd (in liq) [1998] FCA 190 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  10. Northam v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1999] FCA 544 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  11. Bendigo Bank Ltd v Williams [2000] FCA 482 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 19× · judgment
  12. Australian Steel Company (Operations) Pty Ltd v Lewis [2000] FCA 1915 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 44× · judgment
  13. Wright v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2001] FCA 386 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  14. Marshall v General Motors Acceptance Corporation Australia [2003] FCAFC 45 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 3× · judgment
  15. Kyriackou v Shield Mercantile Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 490 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 11× · judgment
  16. Derriman v National Australia Bank Limited [2005] FCA 75 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  17. Worchild v The Drink NightClub (QLD) Pty Ltd ACN 090 830 854, in the matter of Worchild [2005] FCA 863 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  18. Worchild v The Drink Nightclub (Qld) Pty Ltd [2005] FCAFC 240 Distinguished Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 1× · judgment
  19. Miao v Owners Corporation SP 31235U [2015] FCA 352 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  20. Ritson v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (No 3) [2019] FCA 853 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  21. Metledge v Hopkins [2020] FCA 561 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  22. McInerney, in the matter of Ghougassian v Ghougassian [2020] FCA 1230 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.