Federal Court of Australia · 20 February 2002 · Official judgment
No indexed judgment cites this case yet.
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[2000] FCA 1915 Cited cited 44×[1955] HCA 75 Cited cited 59×[1984] HCA 33 Cited cited 38×[1988] HCA 34 Cited cited 135×[1998] HCA 28 Applied or followed cited 2,785×[1981] HCA 26 Cited cited 693×[1994] HCA 15 Cited cited 371×[1995] HCA 20 Cited cited 502×[1997] HCA 4 Cited cited 414×[1999] HCA 36 Cited cited 370×[1980] HCA 12 Cited cited 655×[1988] HCA 15 Cited cited 359×[1992] HCA 23 Cited cited 370×[1997] HCA 25 Cited cited 344×[2000] FCA 1170 Cited cited 42×[1990] HCA 9 Cited cited 107×[1995] HCA 65 Cited cited 212×[1999] HCA 67 Cited cited 453×[1999] FCA 1723 Cited cited 96×[2001] FCA 386 Cited cited 4×[1956] HCA 53 Applied or followed cited 268×(1994) 54 FCR 371 Cited cited 22×[1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×[1981] HCA 26 Cited cited 693×[1994] HCA 15 Cited cited 371×[1995] HCA 20 Cited cited 502×[1997] HCA 4 Cited cited 414×[2000] FCA 1915 Cited cited 44×[1955] HCA 75 Cited cited 59×[1988] HCA 34 Cited cited 135×[1998] HCA 28 Applied or followed cited 2,785×[1999] HCA 36 Cited cited 370×[2000] HCA 10 Cited cited 36×[2000] FCA 574 Cited cited 26×[1988] HCA 34 Applied or followed cited 135×[1991] HCA 9 Applied or followed cited 227×[1997] HCA 2 Cited cited 792×[1998] HCA 28 Applied or followed cited 2,785×Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.