Pinpoint · Judgment search

Linhart v Elms

[1988] FCA 416 ; (1988) 81 ALR 557

Federal Court of Australia · 1988 · Find the judgment

Cited by 15 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 14

1995: 1 citing judgment 1997: 1 citing judgment 1999: 3 citing judgments 2000: 1 citing judgment 2002: 1 citing judgment 2003: 1 citing judgment 2004: 1 citing judgment 2005: 1 citing judgment 2006: 1 citing judgment 2009: 1 citing judgment 2012: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 1 citing judgment 1988 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Todhunter, J.A. v United States of America & Anor [1995] FCA 235 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. Commissioner of Taxation v Radilo Enterprises Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 22 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 18× · judgment
  3. McDade v United Kingdom [1999] FCA 1341 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  4. De Bruyn v Republic of South Africa [1999] FCA 1344 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 29× · judgment
  5. McDade v United Kingdom [1999] FCA 1868 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 18× · judgment
  6. Bennett v Government of the United Kingdom [2000] FCA 916 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 19× · judgment
  7. Dutton v O'Shane [2002] NSWSC 1086 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  8. Dutton v O'Shane [2003] FCAFC 195 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 24× · judgment
  9. United States of America v Griffiths [2004] FCA 879 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  10. Griffiths v United States of America [2005] FCAFC 34 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 16× · judgment
  11. Hermanowski v United States of America [2006] FCAFC 8 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 8× · judgment
  12. Mehl v Federal Republic of Germany [2009] FCA 36 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  13. Konstantinou v Hellenic Republic [2012] FCA 53 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  14. Liem v Republic of Indonesia [2018] FCAFC 135 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 9× · judgment
  15. Rojas v United States of America [2019] FCA 22 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.