Pinpoint · Judgment search

Pauga v Chief Executive of Queensland Corrective Services (No 6)

[2022] FCA 1096

Federal Court of Australia · 16 September 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2023: 1 citing judgment 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Pauga v Chief Executive of Queensland Corrective Services [2023] FCAFC 58 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (62)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Spilsbury [1898] 2 QB 615 Cited cited 5×
  2. Boucaut Bay Company Ltd (in Liq) v Commonwealth [1927] HCA 59 Cited cited 22×
  3. Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Brian Hatch Timber Co (Sales) Pty Ltd [1972] HCA 73 Cited cited 36×
  4. Williams v The Queen [1986] HCA 88 Cited cited 208×
  5. Re Bolton; Ex parte Beane [1987] HCA 12 Cited cited 320×
  6. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex parte Turkoglu [1988] QB 398 Cited cited 3×
  7. Zoeller v Federal Republic of Germany [1989] FCA 802 Cited cited 71×
  8. Winkler v Director of Public Prosecutions [1990] FCA 194 Cited cited 18×
  9. Local Government and Ethnic Affairs v Msilanga [1992] FCA 41 Cited cited 41×
  10. Holt v Hogan (No 1) (1993) 44 FCR 572 Cited cited 20×
  11. Walton v Gardiner [1993] HCA 77 Cited cited 679×
  12. Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 Cited cited 452×
  13. Coco v The Queen [1994] HCA 15 Cited cited 371×
  14. Public Prosecutions (Cth), Director of v Kainhofer [1995] HCA 35 Cited cited 87×
  15. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×
  16. Peniche v Vanstone [1999] FCA 1688 Cited cited 13×
  17. von Arnim v Federal Republic of Germany [1999] FCA 1747 Cited cited 6×
  18. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 Applied or followed cited 971×
  19. Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission [2000] HCA 5 Cited cited 407×
  20. Chan v Minister for Justice & Customs [2001] FCA 170 Cited cited 7×
  21. United Mexican States v Cabal [2001] HCA 60 Cited cited 79×
  22. Knauder v Moore [2002] FCAFC 404 Applied or followed cited 11×
  23. Dutton v O'Shane [2003] FCAFC 195 Cited cited 24×
  24. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB [2004] HCA 32 Cited cited 456×
  25. Al-Kateb v Godwin [2004] HCA 37 Cited cited 237×
  26. Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Australian Workers' Union [2004] HCA 40 Cited cited 137×
  27. Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations v Gribbles Radiology Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 9 Cited cited 35×
  28. SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63 Cited cited 914×
  29. Brock v United States of America [2007] FCAFC 3 Cited cited 11×
  30. Northern Territory v Collins [2008] HCA 49 Cited cited 58×
  31. Zentai v Honourable Brendan O’Connor [2009] FCA 1597 Cited cited 9×
  32. Zheng v Cai [2009] HCA 52 Cited cited 51×
  33. Vasiljkovic v Honourable Brendan O'Connor [2010] FCA 1246 Cited cited 16×
  34. Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 23 Cited cited 283×
  35. Wainohu v New South Wales [2011] HCA 24 Cited cited 199×
  36. Marku v Republic of Albania [2013] FCAFC 51 Cited cited 8×
  37. D'Amore v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2013] NSWCA 187 Cited cited 54×
  38. Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Limited [2015] HCA 28 Cited cited 323×
  39. Plaintiff S297 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 3 Cited cited 38×
  40. North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency Limited v Northern Territory [2015] HCA 41 Cited cited 66×
  41. Southern Han Breakfast Point Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) v Lewence Construction Pty Ltd [2016] HCA 52 Cited cited 63×
  42. SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34 Cited cited 583×
  43. BRF038 v The Republic of Nauru [2017] HCA 44 Cited cited 11×
  44. Liem v Republic of Indonesia [2018] FCAFC 135 Cited cited 9×
  45. Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34 Cited cited 627×
  46. Tulloh v Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Corrective Services [2018] WASC 105 Cited cited 2×
  47. EHF17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1681 Cited cited 39×
  48. Tsvetnenko v United States of America [2019] FCAFC 74 Cited cited 52×
  49. Comcare v Banerji [2019] HCA 23 Cited cited 39×
  50. The Queen v A2 [2019] HCA 35 Cited cited 116×
  51. McHugh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 223 Cited cited 57×
  52. Formica & Forni v Victoria Police [2020] VSC 719 Cited
  53. Matson v Attorney-General (Cth) [2021] FCA 161 Cited cited 16×
  54. Bethell v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 727 Cited cited 5×
  55. Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v Moorcroft [2021] HCA 19 Cited cited 23×
  56. Oakey Coal Action Alliance Inc v New Acland Coal Pty Ltd [2021] HCA 2 Applied or followed cited 22×
  57. Commonwealth of Australia v AJL20 [2021] HCA 21 Cited cited 71×
  58. Pauga v Chief Executive of Queensland Corrective Services [2022] FCA 244 Cited cited 2×
  59. Pauga v Chief Executive of Queensland Corrective Services (No 5) [2022] FCA 684 Cited cited 2×
  60. Matson v Attorney-General [2022] FCA 790 Applied or followed cited 3×
  61. AKW22 v Commonwealth of Australia [2022] FCA 869 Cited cited 8×
  62. Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 26 Cited cited 192×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.