Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · 26 October 2000 · Official judgment
Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited
[2000] NSWIRComm 233
Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
[2007] NSWIRComm 235
Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · judgment
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[1998] 1 VR 359 Applied or followed cited 92×[1999] HCA 54 Applied or followed cited 1,119×[1977] HCA 44 Cited cited 233×[1981] HCA 31 Cited cited 608×[1984] HCA 46 Cited cited 738×[1988] HCA 70 Cited cited 841×[1997] HCA 26 Cited cited 816×[1984] HCA 46 Cited cited 738×[1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×[1988] HCA 70 Cited cited 841×(1991) 23 NSWLR 220 Cited cited 236×(1997) 41 NSWLR 374 Cited cited 278×[2000] NSWIRComm 142 Cited cited 179×[1977] HCA 44 Cited cited 233×(1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Cited cited 804×[1988] HCA 70 Cited cited 841×(1993) 32 NSWLR 683 Cited cited 595×(1993) 47 IR 1 Cited cited 230×[1999] NSWIRComm 343 Applied or followed cited 531×[2000] NSWIRComm 16 Applied or followed cited 29×[1994] NSWIRComm 230 Cited cited 86×(1995) 59 IR 89 Cited cited 78×(1998) 80 IR 326 Cited cited 119×[1998] 1 VR 359 Applied or followed cited 92×[1999] HCA 54 Applied or followed cited 1,119×[1981] HCA 31 Cited cited 608×[1984] HCA 46 Cited cited 738×[1988] HCA 70 Cited cited 841×[1997] HCA 26 Cited cited 816×(1999) 90 IR 432 Cited cited 289×Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.
[2000] NSWIRComm 233 Cited cited 3×[2000] NSWIRComm 241 Cited[2003] NSWIRComm 159 Cited cited 2×[2006] NSWIRComm 165 Cited[2007] NSWIRComm 235 CitedEarliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
[1998] 1 VR 359
Applied or followed cited 92× [1999] HCA 54
Applied or followed cited 1,119× [2000] NSWIRComm 142
Cited cited 179× [2000] NSWIRComm 16
Applied or followed cited 29× Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.