Pinpoint · Judgment search

Simon Richard Lane v The Commonwealth Bank of Australia

[2000] NSWIRComm 274

Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · 15 December 2000 · Official judgment

Cited by 8 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 2 Cited 6

2001: 1 citing judgment 2003: 2 citing judgments 2004: 1 citing judgment 2005: 1 citing judgment 2007: 2 citing judgments 2008: 1 citing judgment 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Westfield Holdings v Adams [2001] NSWIRComm 293 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 84× · judgment
  2. Lipman and Anor v AG Lifestyle Management Pty Limited and Anor [2003] NSWIRComm 160 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 5× · judgment
  3. Jozef Banas v State of New South Wales [2003] NSWIRComm 317 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 6× · judgment
  4. Truelove v Sydney Water Corporation Limited and anor [2004] NSWIRComm 115 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 5× · judgment
  5. Truelove v Sydney Water Corporation Limited and anor [2005] NSWIRComm 191 Applied or followed Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 10× · judgment
  6. Gordon Meggatt v Australian Business Limited [2007] NSWIRComm 182 Applied or followed Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  7. Bowman v Ricegrowers Limited (formerly Ricegrowers' Co-operative Limited) [2007] NSWIRComm 204 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 9× · judgment
  8. Wheelahan v North Coast Area Health Service [2008] NSWIRComm 164 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (19)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Stevenson v Barham (1976) 136 CLR 190 Cited cited 4×
  2. R v Marks; Ex parte Australian Building Construction Employees and Builders Labourers' Federation [1981] HCA 33 Cited cited 60×
  3. Hawkins v Clayton [1988] HCA 15 Cited cited 359×
  4. Biscuit Makers Employees & Flour and Sugar Goods Workers Union (NSW) v Gartrell White (No 3) (1990) 35 IR 70 Cited cited 184×
  5. Bi-Lo Pty Ltd v Hooper (1992) 53 IR 224 Cited cited 18×
  6. Preston v Carmody (1993) 53 IR 206 Cited cited 2×
  7. Liddell v Lembke (1994) 56 IR 447 Cited cited 24×
  8. Gooley v Westpac Banking Corporation (1995) 129 ALR 628 Cited cited 16×
  9. Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd [1995] HCA 24 Cited cited 906×
  10. Francis Travel Marketing Pty Ltd v Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd [1996] NSWSC 104 Cited cited 98×
  11. Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA [1997] UKHL 23 Cited cited 44×
  12. Twohig v Ashford Community Hospital Incorporated (1998) 85 IR 421 Cited
  13. Day v Lumley Life Limited (1999) 90 IR 70 Cited cited 46×
  14. Antonakopoulos v State Bank of New South Wales (1999) 91 IR 385 Applied or followed cited 204×
  15. Beahan v Bush Boake Allen Australia Ltd (1999) 93 IR 1 Cited cited 56×
  16. Aboud v State of New South Wales (Department of School Education) [1999] NSWIRComm 449 Cited cited 127×
  17. Metrocall Inc v Electronic Tracking Systems Pty Ltd [2000] NSWIRComm 136 Cited cited 19×
  18. Reich v Client Server Professionals of Australia Pty Ltd (Administrator Appointed) [2000] NSWIRComm 143 Cited cited 78×
  19. Robert Gordon King v State Bank of New South Wales [2000] NSWIRComm 229 Cited cited 6×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.