Federal Court of Australia · 26 November 2002 · Official judgment
No indexed judgment cites this case yet.
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[2000] FCA 1188 Distinguished cited 43×[1912] AC 716 Cited cited 50×[1949] HCA 60 Cited cited 65×[1971] UKHL 1 Cited cited 173×[1988] HCA 65 Cited cited 135×[1993] HCA 74 Cited cited 129×[1995] HCA 3 Cited cited 410×[1938] HCA 34 Cited cited 3,164×[1983] 1 AC 280 Cited cited 312×[1986] HCA 46 Cited cited 328×[1987] HCA 23 Cited cited 369×[2000] FCA 1203 Cited cited 4×[1975] UKHL 1 Applied or followed cited 110×(1979) 141 CLR 577 Cited cited 12×(1986) 60 ALJR 679 Applied or followed cited 31×[1992] FCA 523 Applied or followed cited 19×[1998] HCA 30 Cited cited 431×[2000] FCA 430 Cited cited 45×[1986] HCA 58 Cited cited 401×[1995] HCA 24 Cited cited 906×[1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×[1998] HCA 30 Cited cited 431×[2000] FCA 874 Cited cited 4×[2001] FCA 628 Distinguished cited 1×[1979] VR 107 Cited cited 5×[1981] VR 23 Applied or followed cited 14×[1989] HCA 53 Cited cited 80×[1991] HCA 49 Cited cited 337×[1998] HCA 30 Applied or followed cited 431×[2000] FCA 430 Applied or followed cited 45×[1986] HCA 58 Cited cited 401×[1995] HCA 24 Cited cited 906×[1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×[1998] HCA 30 Cited cited 431×Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
[2000] FCA 1188
Distinguished cited 43× [2000] FCA 1203
Cited cited 4× [2000] FCA 874
Cited cited 4× [2001] FCA 628
Distinguished Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.