Federal Court of Australia · 3 July 2002 · Official judgment
No indexed judgment cites this case yet.
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[1994] FCA 1253 Cited cited 448×(1994) 34 ALD 347 Cited cited 113×[1998] FCA 1126 Cited cited 139×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×[1990] HCA 47 Distinguished cited 424×[1993] HCA 78 Distinguished cited 520×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1966] HCA 69 Cited cited 109×[1985] HCA 67 Distinguished cited 118×[1986] HCA 7 Cited cited 336×[1992] HCA 57 Cited cited 375×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×[1993] FCA 456 Cited cited 845×[2000] HCA 1 Cited cited 616×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1966] HCA 69 Cited cited 109×[1985] HCA 67 Distinguished cited 118×[1986] HCA 7 Cited cited 336×[1992] HCA 57 Cited cited 375×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×[1993] FCA 456 Cited cited 845×[1997] HCA 22 Cited cited 776×[1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1993] FCA 456 Cited cited 845×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[1999] HCA 21 Cited cited 971×[1999] HCA 14 Cited cited 844×[1986] HCA 40 Applied or followed cited 2,191×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
(1994) 34 ALD 347
Cited cited 113× [1994] FCA 1253
Cited cited 448× [1998] FCA 1126
Cited cited 139× [2000] HCA 1
Cited cited 616× Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.