Lawrence v Morris

[2002] FCA 874

Federal Court of Australia · 11 July 2002 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Scottish Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd v Meyer [1959] AC 324 Cited cited 48×
Levin v Clark [1962] NSWR 686 Cited cited 13×
R v Joske; Ex parte Shop Distributive and Allied Employees' Association [1976] HCA 48 Cited cited 41×
Murphy v Eagleton (1987) 21 IR 419 Cited cited 2×
Re McJannet; Ex parte Minister for Employment, Training and Industrial Relations (Qld) [1995] HCA 31 Cited cited 60×
- Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte [1938] HCA 7 Cited cited 165×
- R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Barrett [1945] HCA 50 Cited cited 183×
- R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Ozone Theatres (Aust) Ltd [1949] HCA 33 Cited cited 141×
- Philip Morris Inc v Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 7 Applied or followed cited 198×
- R v Gray; Ex parte Marsh [1985] HCA 67 Cited cited 118×
- Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×
  - Ex parte White [1966] HCA 69 Cited cited 109×
  - R v Gray; Ex parte Marsh [1985] HCA 67 Distinguished cited 118×
  - Public Service Board of New South Wales v Osmond [1986] HCA 7 Cited cited 336×
  - Dietrich v The Queen [1992] HCA 57 Cited cited 375×
Printing and Kindred Industries Union v Fohmsbee (1998) 81 IR 120 Cited cited 1×

Authorities cited (6)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

Scottish Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd v Meyer [1959] AC 324 Cited cited 48×
Levin v Clark [1962] NSWR 686 Cited cited 13×
R v Joske; Ex parte Shop Distributive and Allied Employees' Association [1976] HCA 48 Cited cited 41×
Murphy v Eagleton (1987) 21 IR 419 Cited cited 2×
Re McJannet; Ex parte Minister for Employment, Training and Industrial Relations (Qld) [1995] HCA 31 Cited cited 60×
Printing and Kindred Industries Union v Fohmsbee (1998) 81 IR 120 Cited

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.