Pinpoint · Judgment search

Drinkwater v Nadinic

[2016] NSWSC 1733

Supreme Court of NSW · 9 December 2016 · Official judgment

Cited by 5 indexed judgments

All Cited 5

2016: 1 citing judgment 2017: 2 citing judgments 2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Nadinic v Drinkwater [2016] NSWCA 377 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Drinkwater as trustee for the Cheryl Drinkwater Trust v Nadinic (No 4) [2017] NSWSC 301 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  3. Nadinic v Drinkwater [2017] NSWCA 114 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 47× · judgment
  4. Cheryl Drinkwater as trustee for the Cheryl Drinkwater Trust v Nadinic [2019] NSWSC 365 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  5. Nadinic v Cheryl Drinkwater as trustee for the Cheryl Drinkwater Trust [2020] NSWCA 2 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 6× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (7)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Reddaway v Banham [1896] AC 199 Cited cited 19×
  2. Brickenden v London Loan & Savings Co [1934] UKPC 25 Cited cited 47×
  3. Farley (Aust) Pty Ltd v JR Alexander & Sons (Qld) Pty Ltd [1946] HCA 29 Cited cited 12×
  4. Lazarus Estates Ltd v Beasley [1956] 1 QB 702 Cited cited 34×
  5. Vadasz v Pioneer Concrete (SA) Pty Ltd [1995] HCA 14 Cited cited 45×
  6. BEACH PETROLEUM NL v ABBOTT TOUT RUSSELL KENNEDY & ORS [1999] NSWCA 408 Cited cited 129×
  7. Orix Australia Corporation Ltd v M Wright Hotel Refrigeration Pty Ltd [2000] SASC 57 Cited cited 5×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.