Federal Circuit Court of Australia · 2017 · Find the judgment
Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited
[2018] FCAFC 80
Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 39× · judgment
Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.
[2018] FCAFC 80 Cited cited 39×[2018] FCA 902 Cited cited 7×[2018] FCAFC 90 Cited cited 9×[2019] FCAFC 146 Cited cited 9×[2019] FCA 1620 Cited cited 7×[2019] FCAFC 203 Cited cited 17×[2020] FCAFC 114 Cited cited 16×[2020] FCAFC 159 Cited cited 27×This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.
Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.