Pinpoint · Judgment search

CAQ17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

[2019] FCAFC 203 ; (2019) 274 FCR 477

Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · 25 November 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 17 indexed judgments

All Cited 17

2019: 2 citing judgments 2020: 5 citing judgments 2021: 3 citing judgments 2022: 2 citing judgments 2023: 5 citing judgments 2019 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. BLR17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 2167 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Fastbet Investments Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 5) [2019] FCA 2073 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 11× · judgment
  3. Singh v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 7 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 18× · judgment
  4. AMV17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 262 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  5. ABH18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 620 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  6. CTP20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1401 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  7. BVZ16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1803 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  8. EBP19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 332 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  9. AOK19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 822 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  10. DBO19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1218 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  11. DPT17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 15 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  12. CEL17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 1503 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  13. EEP18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2023] FCA 682 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  14. DQN19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1162 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  15. BTA18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1272 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  16. DWK22 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1403 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  17. CAU17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1422 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (25)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Bankstown Municipal Council v Fripp [1919] HCA 41 Cited cited 32×
  2. R v Connell; Ex parte Hetton Bellbird Collieries Ltd [1944] HCA 42 Cited cited 253×
  3. Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1949] HCA 26 Cited cited 337×
  4. Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×
  5. Griffiths v The Queen [1989] HCA 39 Cited cited 39×
  6. Telstra Corporation Ltd v Worthing [1999] HCA 12 Cited cited 69×
  7. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 Cited cited 971×
  8. Foster v Minister for Customs and Justice [2000] HCA 38 Cited cited 94×
  9. (2003) 211 CLR 411 Cited cited 3×
  10. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30 Cited cited 648×
  11. Ho v Professional Services Review Committee No 295 [2007] FCA 388 Cited cited 48×
  12. Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 23 Cited cited 283×
  13. Hasim v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth [2013] FCA 1433 Cited cited 5×
  14. Plaintiff M64-2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 50 Cited cited 214×
  15. BVZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 958 Cited cited 86×
  16. CMY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1333 Cited cited 12×
  17. AQU17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 111 Cited cited 69×
  18. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CLV16 [2018] FCAFC 80 Cited cited 39×
  19. Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16 Cited cited 326×
  20. FBR18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 1620 Cited cited 7×
  21. EHF17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1681 Cited cited 39×
  22. DNA17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 146 Cited cited 9×
  23. CAQ17 v Minister for Immigration [2019] FCCA 1807 Cited cited 2×
  24. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3 Cited cited 693×
  25. BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 34 Cited cited 152×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.