Pinpoint · Judgment search

Hasim v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth

[2013] FCA 1433 ; (2013) 218 FCR 25

Federal Court of Australia · 23 December 2013 · Official judgment

Cited by 5 indexed judgments

All Cited 5

2017: 1 citing judgment 2018: 2 citing judgments 2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2013 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. BVZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 958 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 86× · judgment
  2. DYS16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 33 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 31× · judgment
  3. ARN17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 974 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  4. CAQ17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 203 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 17× · judgment
  5. Lodhi v Attorney-General (Cth) [2020] FCA 1383 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 11× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (22)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission (NSW) v Browning [1947] HCA 21 Cited cited 238×
  3. Re W (An Infant) [1971] AC 682 Cited cited 9×
  4. Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council [1976] UKHL 6 Cited cited 55×
  5. Sean Investments Pty Ltd v MacKellar [1981] FCA 191 Cited cited 154×
  6. Bromley London Borough Council v Greater London Council [1983] 1 AC 768 Cited cited 49×
  7. Re Findlay [1985] AC 318 Cited cited 2×
  8. Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×
  9. South Australia v O'Shea [1987] HCA 39 Cited cited 80×
  10. Nikac v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1988] FCA 400 Cited cited 19×
  11. Griffiths v The Queen [1989] HCA 39 Cited cited 39×
  12. Haoucher v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1990] HCA 22 Cited cited 96×
  13. Cornwell v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia (1993) 45 FCR 492 Cited cited 3×
  14. Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×
  15. Brehoi v Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Australia [2000] FCA 1747 Cited cited 9×
  16. United Mexican States v Cabal [2001] HCA 60 Cited cited 79×
  17. MLC Investments Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2003] FCA 1487 Cited cited 6×
  18. Hatcher v Cohn [2004] FCA 1548 Cited cited 16×
  19. Baker v The Queen [2004] HCA 45 Cited cited 76×
  20. Ho v Professional Services Review Committee No 295 [2007] FCA 388 Cited cited 48×
  21. Maan v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCAFC 150 Cited cited 18×
  22. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 Cited cited 1,516×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.