Pinpoint · Judgment search

Randall v Chief of Army

[2018] ADFDAT 3

Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal · 10 July 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 3 indexed judgments

All Cited 3

2020: 1 citing judgment 2022: 2 citing judgments 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Randall v Chief of the Defence Force [2020] FCA 1327 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Private R Army v Chief of Army [2022] ADFDAT 1 Cited Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal · cited 6× · judgment
  3. Kearns v Chief of Army [2022] ADFDAT 3 Cited Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (16)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] UKHL 1 Cited cited 50×
  2. Re Manion's Appeal (1962) 9 FLR 91 Cited cited 2×
  3. (1964) 1 Federal Law Review 95 Cited
  4. Sorby v The Commonwealth [1983] HCA 10 Cited cited 147×
  5. Knight v The Queen [1992] HCA 56 Cited cited 85×
  6. Environment Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd [1993] HCA 74 Cited cited 129×
  7. M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63 Cited cited 970×
  8. MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53 Cited cited 513×
  9. (2003) 1 NILR 311 Cited
  10. Sheldrake v Director of Public Prosecutions [2005] 1 AC 264 Cited cited 3×
  11. Fulton v Chief of Army [2005] ADFDAT 1 Cited cited 4×
  12. Momcilovic v The Queen [2011] HCA 34 Cited cited 108×
  13. Li v Chief of Army [2013] HCA 49 Cited cited 9×
  14. Lee v The Queen [2014] HCA 20 Cited cited 111×
  15. Queen v Baden-Clay [2016] HCA 35 Cited cited 340×
  16. Komljenovic v Chief of Navy [2017] ADFDAT 4 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.